Friday, April 23, 2010

Was Jesus the First Socialist?

... and would he have joined the ANC?

40 Opinion(s):

Anonymous said...

Definitely wouldn't have joined ANC!
Jesus was the most FAIR man ever to have lived! The ANC is very unfair or they would either give the minority groups their own countries (like Apartheid did with the non-indigenous Bantu people who settled in South Africa) OR they would ignore ethnicity altogether, which I'm sure anyone would agree is a step too far for such a racist organisation!

Anonymous said...

Jesus was a Nationalist Socialist! His whole raison d'etre was to bring fairness to the world: each Nation to his own area and each to his own ability, looking after his own Nation at peace with neighbouring Nations.

Anonymous said...

Well, he was a joo, so yes. He was a commie bastard through and through.

HP said...

Anonymous 24 April 2010 00:08

Boy He's gonna kick your ass so hard
one day when you stand before HIM.
For calling HIM "commie bastard"
good luck pal

Anonymous said...

Who would Jesus crucify?

Exzanian said...

Nice Viking, you're never one to shy away from a controversial post! I would say yes (if an historical Jesus ever existed) he was a commie, through and through....

Krokodil said...

Not quite, Exzanian, Communism is the FORCED redistribution of wealth, Christianity the entirely voluntary sharing of wealth.

Jesus' warnings of storing up wealth were directed at those who treasured materialism above the things of God.

The very early Church (book of Acts) shows in practice how it was supposed to work - the better off were generous with their excess so that they were not TOO much better off, whilst the poor were not TOO poor. This sharing was voluntary, strictly for those within the Church, and not an exact redistribution (which it was never meant to be - in other words, based on genuine need).

Furthermore, both Jesus and Paul spoke about the iniquity of laziness, and how hard work should be rewarded materially. It was also the practice of the early Church to deny any form of welfare to those who refused to get off their butts - and again, this was specific to fellow Christians.

Jesus also used a parable about the ownership of land and, whilst not directly the theme of the parable, it is clear that such ownership is perfectly legitimate based on the context in which he spoke.

I think it is more realistic to say that Communism is a kind of counterfeit Christianity, with the state acting as Divine Providence. Like all counterfeit religions, it was/is destined to fail.

As for Jesus joining any political party - umm, I don't think so.

eduard said...

Typical. This blog allows blasphemy, just like the Amerikwans, but you you can't say anything about the scum of the earth Khazars (Joooos).
Pontius Pilate wrote a letter to Tiberius regarding the crucifixion of Christ. It may be wise for these blasphemous morons who have a kaffir mentality, to read that letter. A translation of that letter can be observed at

Anonymous said...

Today blasphemy is only acceptable as long as it is directed against the Christian faith.

There is an anti-white, anti-christian agenda worldwide and the group behind it controls so much of the worldly power structures that it is becoming more and more impossible to criticise them.

The sheeple have been totally reprogrammed and they do not heed the danger signs any longer.

Viking said...

Well, Eduard, I have made it clear I'm a Christian on a few occasions so have no time for blasphemy but I tend to think that G-d can take it and that personal is responsible for what they say :)

I agree with Krokodil too- and I think you have it in a nutshell in your first paragraph.
Christianity should never be about getting the government to do "good works"!

Anonymous said...

Yahweh mandated that each species reproduce "after it's kind." And He specifically commanded the Israelites (whom are the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred peoples as discussed in this earlier article) to practice racial segregation, and forbid race-mixing:

Deuteronomy 14:2 "For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God, and the LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth."

Exodus 33:16 "So shall we be separated, I and all of Thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth."

Deuteronomy 7:3 "Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son."

Joshua 23:12-13 "if ye do in any wise go back and cleave unto the remnant of these nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriage with them and go in unto them and they unto you: know for a certainty that they shall be snares and traps unto you and scourges in your sides and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish off from this good land which the Lord your God has given you."

Ezra 9:2 "For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the HOLY SEED have MIXED themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this TRESPASS."

Nehemiah 9:2 "And the seed of Israel separated themselves from all STRANGERS and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers."

Note: "Strangers" above in Nehemiah 9:2 is from the Hebrew word "nekar", meaning "a foreigner" or an "alien".

Nehemiah 13:3 "Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the MIXED multitude."

Hosea 5:7 "They have dealt treacherously against YAHWEH: for they have begotten STRANGE children:"

Note: The word "strange" from Hosea 5:7 is from the Hebrew word "zuwr", meaning "a foreigner".

Deuteronomy 23:2: "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord, even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord."

Note: The word "bastard" above in Deuteronomy 23:2 is from the Hebrew word "mamzer", which is defined as "a mongrel" or person of mixed-race.

Therefore, the true meaning of this passage is that mongrels or offspring of mixed-race cannot become one of Yahweh's people until after the 10th generation. After the 10th generation, the person would have only 1/1024 (0.1% or 0.001) non-Israelite (non-white) blood in their veins. This shows how seriously Yahweh views racial purity.


Note that those whom are advocating race mixing are doing the work of the anti-christ.

Exzanian said...

Anon 00:40 - Actually, it's Yahweh that sounds like the bastard from those verses you so glibly quoted! Why would the creator of the universe be concerned with petty human tribalisms? Surely, if there is a GAWD, and he created us all, is he not supposed to love his entire creation? (even if we are the ones who have been squabbling and fighting with each other since the beginning of time) Please, oh fucking please, find a decent, rational basis for your views and not some half cocked, hackneyed claptrap based on the disjointed and feverish pipe dreams of some filthy desert travellers who thought the earth was flat and the sun floated around it in a perfect circle!

Anonymous said...

Jesus was gay, Jesus slept around with whores, Jesus was crazy, Jesus didn't exist, now Jesus is a commie. There are disgusting sex toys made in the figure of Jesus, in every piece of shit movie Jesus and Christians are being made fun of. It never ends does it!

To all the athiests here, get over it you fucking retarded morons, if he didn't exist why the FUCK are you so bothered with him!?

You are the most hateful people on earth, you can never let it go, you have to always, always, fuck with the Christians. I am done with this blog and it's fucking intolerant atheists.

Am I raging, yes I am. But seriously, fuck you all!

Viking said...

"Yahweh mandated that each species reproduce "after it's kind." And He specifically commanded the Israelites (whom are the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred peoples"

No, they aren't.

Anon 04:01
which of the seven of us are you addressing?

Exzanian said...

Anon 25 April 2010 04:01
Chill dude, it's not that bad!

Krokodil said...

@anon 4:01 Are you a Christian? If you are, where do you justify using such language?

Re: anon 00:40 and 00:42. I don't know what peculiar sect you belong to, but the theology you present is so distorting and narrow, that I will go so far as to say it borders on heresy - certainly it doesn't square with anything in the New Testament.

You are surely confusing the Christian Church (which is a genuinely multicultural, multiracial organisation - the only valid one as far as I'm concerned), with the Israelites of old. What evidence exists that the ancient Hebrews were Caucasian? None, as far as I'm aware - they were Semitic people after all.

In any event, let me just say this, neither Catholicism, general Protestantism, Greek or Russian Orthodoxy, Pentecostalism, the Evangelical churches, Coptic Christianity, 7th Day Adventists and general Charismatic Christianity - this list is not exhaustive but clearly encompasses most of the Christian Church - do NOT subscribe to your bizarre beliefs regarding who is eligible for salvation.

Every sinner is eligible for salvation - that includes whites, blacks, browns, yellows, reds and any other colour or combination thereof; and such is the REALITY of the Church both today and in history.

Exzanian, one other point I forgot to mention earlier - Jesus also gave a parable where he made a reference, in a clearly positive manner, to the soundness of making a good investment and earning interest from it.

Now, if Jesus says that you can own property, earn money from investments, must graft hard for your living and STORE-UP what is necessary for lean times (lesson about the ants), and that if you don't graft, don't expect to have anything - is that a Communist talking?

There is no question that Jesus issued warnings about accumulating wealth for the sake of greed, and essentially "worshipping" it, but he does not criticise free enterprise, running businesses or the legitimate pursuit of money.

You have to understand the context: Jesus makes clear that one cannot serve both God and money (Mammon). In other words, it is where one's heart is.

Anonymous said...

You people mock, because you have n understanding. You sat the Bible in incorrect. It is not. It has been translated incorrectly and for this one has to examine why the Khazars would want to do such a thing.

For example.
The bible does not say anywhere that the earth was created 6,000 years ago, it says that Adam was created 6,000 years ago. Big difference.

The critics like to say that the Bible says the earth was created in six days. This is not true. The Hebrew word for day is "yom" This word also means "era"

In Hebrew the bible says that the eart was created over six Yom.
You could either read this as 6 days or six eras. If you wanted to mislead you would use, days.

Check your Bible. Man and women are created in Gen 1. Adam and Eve are only created in Gen2. Adam was created 6,000 years ago. Adam in Hebrew means to be able to blush red, to be ruddy. Adam was the first white man.

The trees in the garden of Eden are not trees at all, but represents nations. there are multiple other places in the Bible where trees are likened to nations.

for example...
Ezekiel 31:9
I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: so that all the trees of Eden, that were in the garden of God, envied him.

(You mock, because you lack even basic understanding)

Yahweh looked at creation and all was good and He said to Adam, you may eat of any tree, (you may race mix) just not the tree of knowledge of good and bad, which is Satan as Yahshua is the tree of life.

But later on he changed the race mixing rule. the reason he did so was because the serpent seduced Eve. By the way the Hebrew word for serpent is 'Nakash' which is better translated as Enchanter.
Snakes do not talk.

He changed the rule because of the following.
Genesis 3:3 (Whole Chapter)
But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye "touch" it, lest ye die.

The Hebrew word for "touch" above is "naga" and it means to lie with a women.

Eve was seduced sexually. When Yahweh said that their will be enmity between the two seeds, the Hebrew word for seed is "Zehra" and it also means children.

Satan thus has a physical seed line on the earth today and this seed is very, very busy trying to destroy the white seed line.
Mat 13:25 is the parable of the sower(Yahweh) and his enemy(satan) that sowed his seed( in Hebrew means children) amongst the sower's seed at night. And so I could continue to explain the whole bible to you, but it would be pointless.

You people mock because you have no understanding. The more you study the Bible the more it reveals itself. Beware your mockery, because you will receive more in return than what you gave.

The white seed line is under attack by the seed of satan and this has been going on since the dawn of time.

FishEagle said...

Well said Krokodil.

Anonymous said...

Krokodil, why do you waste your precious time with these people? Have you not learned that they are there simply to mock and ridicule, that your arguments means nothing to them? Have you not learned that their tolerance goes only as far as their own skin and that you are being drawn out into an endless and rhetoric argument? I have been told by an angry atheist that Christians kills babies. Apart from laughing, what do you say to that? "Prove it"? Do you think he cares if it is true or not? Sorry to tell you, but you are a hated kind on this earth. There is no more place for you and your religion.

What am I? I am an angry Christian, tired of these people, tired of their never ending charades, tired of their same old arguments, tired of being ridiculed, tired of the politics, tired of this world. Once I was a Christian trying to convince everyone it is the only true way to happiness and freedom. Now I am a Christian who feels raped of the little decency and tolerance I had left... these people have had their way with me for too long. On the left are the blacks who wants me dead because of my white skin, on the right are the atheists who wants to strip me from my lunacy, for I am a fucking retard for what I believe in. One day I may even indoctrinate my retarded kids in believing the same thing!

Call me a drama queen, call me a lunatic, call me a moronic religious nutcase, you won't be the first and you won't be the last. Adieu my fellow humans I have no more hope for you or myself.

Anonymous said...


I have noticed a rather disturbing trend over the past 2 years that there are more and more white South Africans starting to talk about and use the name Yahweh. Could you explain where and how this came about? It is as if people are wanting to start a new religion.

1. Now she was not allowed to mate with the snake as he seduced her or is it because he was the devil and not a nation or is there a devil nation?

2. Now also why did Yahweh create non whites when he was into racial purity - after all there were trees in the Garden of Eden?

3. Last question - so where do the Nogs, Chinks and Mongrels go? Surely even under aparthied there was a second class subway and toilet - why not a heaven? We should never have allowed Verwoed in first - now look at the shit he has created!

Anonymous said...

In the end (mockery aside) their will only be two options.

For Christ or against Christ. (anti)

The bible teaches that in the last days those that are for him will be killed.....not mocked like today, but killed.

Anonymous said...

Jesus might have been a Judean, but he wasn't a Jew.
Here what a Jew called Benjamin Freedman had to say abou the subject.

The word Jew only came into existence in the 1600's. The word Jew does not exist the original Hebrew Bibles. The word in the original Hebrew bibles is actually "Judean" and like an American being a Judean means that one could belong to any one of a number of different racial groups.

You had Samarians and Pharisees(these are the people that are known as Jews today) You also had the tribe of Juda of which Jesus was a member and the tribe of Israel.

Anonymous said...

@Jim Bean you ask where the name Yahweh stems from. It is the name of God and it's found in the old Hebrew texts. This was before the Pharisees had the name removed and substituted.

It is true what you say with more and more people beginning to call God by his personal name. This was prophesied to happen during the last days.

Yahweh is God's name. The word God is a title, Lord is also a title. Yahweh is the personal name of God.

In Hebrew vowels are pronounced in normal speech, but they are not written down. In the original Hewbrew Bibles, God's name is known as the Tetragrammaton and it is spelt as YHWH.

The Levites used to be the priests of Israel, but after the Babylonian invasion, they were substituted with Babylonian priests. These priest became known as the Pharisees and it is these priests that called themselves Jews that killed the Judean called Jesus.

These Pharisees were also responsible the copying of the Bible, having taken over the role as priests from the Levites.

They decided to substitute the name of God (YHWH) with the name of Baal. (Adonai) how they ackomplised this was to say that the name of God(YHWH) is too holy to be pronounced. Thus they installed the vowels of the word Adonai into the Tetragrammaton, YHWH and thus you got Yahovah. Everytime Yahovah was to be pronounced, the vowels had to remind the reader to pronounce the name as Adonai.
Google it, Baal = Adonai = Lord

Now what I find facinating is that a small group would go to such huge efforts to try and deceive.
At the same time they are trying to tell the deceived that their religion is of no relevance.


Anonymous said...

Wake up you white chritian idiots.
Think about it will you. Who gave you the bible stories? Who gave you christ? Who forced all that bullshit down your open gullets, like the mental babies you are?
I´ll give you a clue.
It´s the same people who fuck you over every day. It´s the same people who rule you and have enslaved you. It´s the same people who claim to be gods chosen people.
Come on, you should get it now. LOL.
Dumb fucks. That´s what the white man is. A bunch of dumb fucks.

Anonymous said...

"1. Now she was not allowed to mate with the snake as he seduced her or is it because he was the devil and not a nation or is there a devil nation?"

Yes she was not allowed to touch (touch in Hebrew means to lie with) the "Nakash" (which means enchanter or deceiver) He is also described as the tree of good and EVIL.

The deceiver said that if Eve wanted to be like God, eating from the tree of good and evil would make her so.

Yahweh knows both good and evil and because mankind wanted to be more like God and thus ate the fruit, they have been exposed to evil ever since and this will continue to the end of days.

The seed(Zehra ,means child) of satan is Cain. This is why Yahweh rejected his offering. This is why Cain KILLED Abel.

NOTE: Adam's descendants are listed in the Bible and Cain is not listed. The reason for this is obvious, as Cain was not Adam's son.

After Abel's murder Cain was thrown out of East and he movd to the East where he took a wife and build a city. He could do this because there were plenty of people (pre-Adamites) on earth.

Historically the people living in that area were the Summarians. They were a primitive bunch and they benefited greatly from the knowledge of Cain.
Cain like his other family lived a long life. He also was the first person to subvert the truth in terms of religion.
He was known as Sargon during those days.

After the Cain incident Yahweh became positively postal about race mixing and one can understand why.


The pure races left are the ones that remain anti mixing. The ones that screw anything, they are the ones with the seed of Cain.

The Bible for instance says that Noah was perfect in his generations. In Hebrew this meant that he was racially pure. At that time his family was the last pure family on earth and this is why the land was flooded. Incidentally the Bible says that at the end of days it will be like it was during the time of Noah, meaning that race mixing will be at the order of the day. (Sarkovsky for example said to the French that it is in their best interest to race mix.)

The "land" was flooded, not the whole world. The Hebrew word used is "Erets" which does mean earth but it also means land.

Anonymous said...

@ Jim:
"2. Now also why did Yahweh create non whites when he was into racial purity - after all there were trees in the Garden of Eden?"

Do you know that their are 5 different words that have been translated from the Hebrew Bibles as the word "man" in the English Bible.

thought not.

Like the word "Enosh" that means primitive man.
Or the word "Ish" that they also translated to man.
What about the word "Adam" that also means ruddy man. etc.

Look to be safe all you can say is that you cannot criticise the Christian faith, because you do not know anything about it. The faith you have heard about and that you think is Christian, is not it at all.

Yahweh created ALL and it was ALL GOOD. All the races that were created were good in the eyes of God.

Make sure you use this point above as a reference point.

It was only when satan established his physical seed here on earth that race mixing became very, very bad.

God didn't say, don't mix with Cain's people in the East. He wanted to be sure tgat it didn't happen and thus said, if you mix, you die. Like I said Yahweh went postal on that issue.

He hates Satan and he hated Cain.


1 John 3:12
Not as Cain, who was OF THAT WICKED ONE, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous.

Cain was the spawn or SEED of Satan. Seed in Hebrew is "Zehra" and it means "child"

Check out this verse:
Jude 1:11
Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.

Now if you do a bit of research you'll find that Balaam's way is the way of RACE MIXING.

Anonymous said...

"3. Last question - so where do the Nogs, Chinks and Mongrels go? Surely even under aparthied there was a second class subway and toilet - why not a heaven? We should never have allowed Verwoed in first - now look at the shit he has created!"

Anyone who believes will be saved.

Jesus did say the following:
24But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

Which one could take to mean that he came exclusively to save his flock, the Israelites, but then it is clarified for us.

26But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.

What he is saying above is that one should not take the Children(Israelites) bread(the gospel) and cast it to the dogs(non Israelites)

27And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.

Above she says that although it is true that Jesus came for his sheep, His grace is in such abundance so that there will be left over for those that are in search of it.

The Adamites were to have been the priests of creation, instead they have become the whores.

Viking said...

I regret posting this.

There is nothing in the OT about "race mixing", except in connection with the Israelites. it is clear in the NT that this is an outdated concept.

Anonymous said...

MONGRELIZATION IS THE WORST FORM OF "GENOCIDE". If you kill 99% of a race, but leave the other 1% pure blooded, they will in time restore the race. But, when you mongrelize them, you have destroyed that race eternally. Once mixed with the Black or Yellow Races, the White Race would be totally and forever destroyed. Hence, God has forbidden it.


NOAH WAS SAVED BECAUSE HE WAS PURE BLOODED, WHILE THOSE AROUND HIM WERE MONGRELIZED. Genesis 6:2,4-5, records the forbidden mixing of races and the evil results thereof. But of Noah,

GENESIS 6:9 "Noah was a just man and perfect (Hebrew 'taw-meem - without blemish) in his generations (Hebrew 'to-led-aw'- descent, ancestry). Hence, Noah and his family were saved while the mongrels were wiped out.


JUDE 7 "Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication and GOING AFTER STRANGE FLESH, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire."

Luddy said...

Balaam's error was to try and curse Israel and associate with and work for those who had an anti-Israel stance or actions - nothing about race mixing.

Anonymous said...


Come now dont be a prude. G-D is taking a swipe at you for starting a thread in jest!


This is rather interesting. Do you know if the Bible as you are interpreting it has anything to say about South Africa and what is to come?

As for the race mixing you are correct as it also states this in the Koran that it will be the start of the end days and the coming of the Dajal (Anti Christ). Women dressing like men, corruption and worshiping of money and homosexuality becoming normal. I think that is why the Arabs and Persians hate the Americans so much as their "MTV Culture" is destroying everything.

Any views on South Africa from a Bible perspective?

Para Bellum said...

The Living Word of God Eternal was a National Socialist with a twist. Israel first. Any-one who believes second, but equal. A lot like what we tried to do. Seperate but equal. The Etrnal Creator loves all His creation, but His hand is raised against the sons of Cain who work iniquity. The redemption of Israel is Gods purpose as He has chosen them as His portion and His inheritance. His second goal is that none should perish, but whosoever should believe that the Christ is the Son of God and whosoever should confess Him before men should be saved.

Race mixing per se is not the core issue here. The core issue is mixing with the sons of Cain - who are given to do the work of their ancestor Satan. As you cannot tell who is a son of Cain and who is merely "darker in hue" by looking at them, God FORBID His chosen people (Israel) not to mix with ANY other nations in marriage. By looking closely at people you will soon see if they are of Cain or not. By the fruit of the tree you know the tree. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Mainly the godless dark nations are more given to do the work of Cain, and some of them are of Cain, others are simply "darker". Many "white" people are about the work of Cain, and God instructs His people to not be unequaly yoked. This is deeper than colour and goes to the heart of man. Does your partner support you or work against you? Does she believe the same gospel as you do? Does she have the same outlook on life as you do? Are her core values the same as yours? The sons and daughters of Cain will always try to turn the Israel nations away from God, no matter what their colour. It is sad that Cain cleaved to the "darker" pre adamites, and so excluded them from the blessings of Israel that they could have had by marriage to an Israelite.

By their works you will know them!

Para Bellum said...

PS: Jesus did not come to abolish the law but to write it on the hearts of man through His Spirit. The law still stands and should be obeyed out of joy in it's goodness and purity and not a sense of duty.

Not one jot or tittle will pass away.

I have not come to abolish the law but to complete it.

Anonymous said...

Luddy said...

"Balaam's error was to try and curse Israel and associate with and work for those who had an anti-Israel stance or actions - nothing about race mixing."

My reply:
"Absolute rubbish, as the error of Balaam IS ALL ABOUT RACE MIXING."
Thwarted by God in his attempt to curse Israel, Balaam proposed a different strategy against them.

(See Num. 31:16). If the Moabite women could entice the Israelites into idolatry and immorality, it would not be necessary to curse them. God Himself would bring judegment upon them. Balaam's second strategy succeeded and 24,000 Israelites perished under God's judgment (Num. 25:1-9).

Do you understand now.

Anonymous said...

No he would have his own party.
He was a leader, not a follower.

Viking said...

Well put, Anon. 04:22

What bothers me, is that quite a few commenters were quite happy to be offended by this post which, not including the title, consists of seven words.

The image, by the way, is NOT blasphemous, being a product of a Church of England youth campaign from about 12 years ago, when i was at college in fact.

The caption was:
"meek? Mild? As if."
Which I think makes a very good point. Replacing Che, the communist murdered, with an image of Christ is quite a deft stroke and it's always stuck in my mind.

The question of whether Jesus would have joined the ANC is, coming from this blog, clearly a rhetorical one, and the whole idea stems from the claim of many social-democrat types that Jesus was the first socialist, which is explained upon following the link.

The idea of Jesus as a socialist is a personal pet peeve of mine.

Exzanian said...

Just an observation on my part, not a judgment, but there are three things I have come to realise about readers of this blog, they are predominantly:

1) Vociferous Xtians
2) Anti-semites
3) Conspiracy theorists

Anonymous said...


Imagine what the rest of South africa looks like!

Anonymous said...

People that read this blog are generally fairly race aware. This awareness would have caused most of them to realise that something is amiss, due to the extreme media bias for instance. As soon as most people become aware of the media bias, which is strongly denied, they can see for themselves that conspiracies do exist.

Then comes the questions of why, when, where what etc.
After these baby steps it is easy to progress down the road to the ultimate truth.

trey cruz said...

And the truth is that the media in all it's permutations is controlled by internationalist Jews who are bent on the enslavement and eventual destruction of the Goyim, beginning with those of Christian European decent.

Don't take my word for it.
Study the Talmud.