Sunday, September 27, 2009

The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States

From the Archives of

In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

Like Ahab’s search for the Great White Whale, liberals’ search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley’s and Al Sharpton’s then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn’t matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men’s treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America. To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under “Victims and Offenders” download the pdf file for 2005.)

In Table 42, entitled “Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender,” we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:

In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.

The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:

Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney’s Sex Crimes Unit, noted, “There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen…. It’s my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it’s my job to prosecute the real thing.”

No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.

Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, “a white woman was raped by black man.” Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women’s apartments on Manhattan’s Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media’s reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.

Lawrence Auster
is the author of Erasing America: The Politics of the Borderless Nation.

12 Opinion(s):

Ranger Tom said...

All's I'll say is these two things. One, it doesn't surprise me, and two, I usually stick to my own species. ;)

Viking said...

Glad to hear it, Ranger Tom!
And good to hear from you again.

Great post -
I wonder if the US justice system will take a cue from the school in Tucson, Az, who have just introduced a racially-based punishment system for students.
The definition of "rape" for blacks could be changed, until the statistics reflect no racial bias at all.
Maybe Rape-while-black could be reduced to "heavy petting" or "black love" or something.

Anonymous said...

@ RT, how did your exams go?

Anonymous said...

Open this site...

Note that it is an official US department of justice document.
Also note the "gov" in the address above.

Now go to table 42 at the site above.
Alternatively click on the link that will take you directly there.
(I try to make it as easy as possible)

You'll se a racial breakdown of the various crimes.

Now look at rape.
You'll see that in 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004 NOT A SINGLE black was raped by a white IN THE WHOLE USA.

Whites do not rape blacks, period. Blacks on the other hand love to rape whites.

What is also noteworthy is the mention of interracial robbery.
In 1998, 2001, 2004 not a single blacks was robbed by a white in the whole USA.

Look and compare rape, robbery and murder and then you have to agree that the blacks have got a gall to call whites racists, when the statistics clearly proof that they are the ones guilty of racist behaviour.

This is why black government like the South African government refuse to break down crime into racial catagories.

It reflects badly on blacks and proves indeed that there is nothing noble about the black savage.
Crime is a black problem.


Ranger Tom said...

@Doberman: Exams went off great, scored 100% on 4 and the final was 98%...

FishEagle said...

@African4, thanks for the link

Anonymous said...

I've said it before and I'll say it again: I'm amazed that, knowing which "people" own "the Press", you guys are still surprised by the angle taken by those tha would destroy the "white Christian" peoples of the World!

irbyz said...

Interesting link, thanks, even if that's not for the whole of the US.

If you see those are estimated totals from a sample of 135k people (for 2006).
The number of individuals in that "100%" in 2005 was just over 10, but under 10 (hence the asterisk) for 2006; for the equivalent table.

Anonymous said...

Irbyz said:
"Interesting link, thanks, even if that's not for the whole of the US."

African4's reply:
This however does not mean that the information is incorrect. As you have shown large sample sizes were used.

And the totals given are factual. These are the first column marked "white only and black only. The INTERracial statistics were determined by taking random samples.

If you were to increase the sample size, the ratio's would stay the same. It is basic science.

Anonymous said...

Here is another interesting website(e-book) called: "The colour of crime"

And guess what, it confirms the previous study. The only way to reduce black crime, is to do it the South African way and that is to stop dividing it racially. The West is learning fast that they have to do this in order to uphold the illusion of equality.


Anonymous said...

What is noteworthy is that the "colour of crime" mentions that hispanic crimes against blacks count as white on black crime.


They do so desperately have to massage the truth in order to MAINTAIN THEIR ILLUSION.

Anonymous said...

"THEY" say it's going to rain!