Wednesday, September 30, 2009

From the "Get a Life" dept.

They just won't stop busting this guy's chops. This gets people more riled than the news that 18000+ of our citizens were murdered last year. Where are their priorities? Actually, casting Semenya and what Teazers means in the same picture, yuk...

"I am sick and tired of bloody women who have nothing to do but look at Teazers billboards and complain. There are a lot more serious things that are happening in the country like corruption, crime and all that than complain about a billboard," Jackson said.

What men want -
A post we did about Teazers in July 2008 when people complained about another advert being too risqué.

What does a suggestive new Teazers billboard have in common with Caster Semenya?

Nothing! If you believe Teazers owner Lolly Jackson.

The billboard, on display in Rivonia Road, Sandton, shows a woman with ample breasts laying on her back. Her left arm covers her breasts and her knees are bent. The words "No need for gender testing!" are written across the billboard.

But despite the glaring "gender testing" link, Jackson said it was all a coincidence. "The (Semenya) gender test was the furthest thing from my mind when we did the advert.

"If it is construed in another way, maybe it should be that I am directing it at Leonard Chuene - that I am honest, I do not lie when I put my billboards up there," he said yesterday.

Jackson said he came up with the words himself and that they were self-explanatory.

"I do not want anyone coming here (to Teazers) with the idea that we do not have women. We have women, 100 percent women here. I did a test on them, I am a professional and they are 100 percent wo-men," he said, laughing.

But one person is not laughing and has laid a complaint about the billboard with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which could lead to Jackson being forced to remove it if it is found to be offensive.

"Some religious freak complained, only a religious fool would complain about that. Maybe the woman who complained should lose a bit of weight and her husband will then stop looking at the Teazers billboard, maybe she is fat and ugly. I don't give a s**t about her moral issues.

"I am sick and tired of bloody women who have nothing to do but look at Teazers billboards and complain. There are a lot more serious things that are happening in the country like corruption, crime and all that than complain about a billboard," Jackson said.

"It is a nice advert and the woman is a wonderful specimen of a lady. I wish there were a lot more in Sandton looking like her".

He also attacked ASA, calling them "a bunch of idiots doing a worthless job".

But Corné Koch, the communications manager of ASA, said it is not the body's role to stop people from complaining. "We protect consumers and ensure professionalism among advertisers. We are there to look at complaints. We do not monitor adverts, we react to complaints."

Regarding this billboard, Koch said ASA had received a complaint on September 19, with the complainant claiming the advert was offensive. They have yet to take action, as they are waiting for Jackson to provide them with an image of the advert.

He had until today to do so, but Jackson said he will reply to the ASA in his own time - and when he feels like it.

"They can go and look for it themselves. People are only complaining because it is Teazers. Remove the word Teazers and replace them with sunbeds or Sun International and there would be no complaints," he said. - The Star

Off topic: Billy Connolly on religion

This one is dedicated to our good mate ExZanian from some of his fellow contributors, he knows what this is about and a word of warning to all of you religious types, this is not for you.

Obama and White People: Where History Gets Weird

By Mark Butterworth at American Thinker

So here we have Barack — raised by whites, protected and privileged by whites, guided by whites, funded by whites, managed by whites, and finally, elected by whites. And someone who has turned all his inner rage into a diatribe against the society of whites and its free markets, liberties, government, culture, traditions, and beliefs.

And we have Michelle, affirmed by whites, promoted by whites, enriched by whites, and angry that all her success came, not from her own community, but as spoils from condescending whites, liberal guilt and noblesse oblige to less brilliant “coloreds” such as herself.

James Lewis noted in 2008: ". . . Barack and Michelle seem to suffer from real feelings of inferiority. Michelle is a Princess of Privilege -- Princeton University, Harvard Law School and her 300K job today. And yet, she tells us that she spent years feeling bad about being black in America, as she told the world in her undergraduate thesis, at the very time when blacks are moving ahead faster than ever before in human history."

Think of what they owe Bill Ayers and the trust they’ve placed in him. He could spill the beans of what he’s done for them at any time, but he won’t. Obama is his Manchurian Candidate, his Trojan horse, his Quisling for Marxism and the ruin of white America.

But Obama can’t destroy America anymore than Wilson, FDR, Jimmy Carter could. He can damage it, but never transform it, which means Obama fails, retires to private life like Jimmy Carter. He can certainly enrich himself as an ex-President as Bill Clinton has done, but underneath it all there lingers the sub-conscious knowledge for he and Michelle that it all began with a lie, unearned wealth, and white privilege.

This is history being weird.

Read the full post here.

Affirmative Decline In Medical Practitioner Competence

Related Articles:
Entrenching Mediocrity
Is Our Education System Being Dumbed Down (Part II)

An earlier post by Angulus Calx got me thinking about the medical profession. You will recall that UCT implemented racist selection criteria, where blacks only require a 74% average at matric level, to gain entrance to the UCT medical school. This, as opposed to coloureds at 78%, Asians at 88% and whites at 91%.

Apparently this is their effort at redressing past oppression, which of course it isn't. This has got to do with appeasement. The brightest minds know that intelligence has got very little to do with your environment, or for that matter, oppression. Intelligence is heritable; it is in your genes. So by lowering the admission requirements, you simply increase the levels of mediocrity and incompetence. Of course this is tautological, as we already know this.

To briefly cover some old terrain; using the IQ spread amongst the different population groups, as well as the Department of Education's numbers, we were able to determine what IQ level would be required by the different race groups, and the numbers that UCT could choose from.

To recap:

Whites require an IQ of 138, and there would be approximately 188 candidates to choose from.

Coloureds and blacks require an IQ of 125, and there would be approximately 62 coloureds to choose from, BUT no blacks.

What? No Blacks?

Yes, and that means that UCT is probably lowering the standards even further, as are all the other medical schools, thereby introducing Doctor Death via incompetence.

Is my research wayward? Hardly. Let's have a look at a similar exercise that was conducted in the USA.

If admission to medical school was determined strictly by the scores achieved on the MCAT only 7 blacks in the entire USA would probably be admitted to the top 10 schools. Yet the odds favouring black student applicants over whites is a massive 21:1.

To put it more simply; physicians are chosen from the pool that has an IQ of at least 114, at least in theory. This equates to 4.8 black physicians to 100 white physicians. Yet as far back as 1970 the ratio was already 23:100. In 1980 the ratio was 30:100. Which means that 84% of the black physicians have an IQ less than 114 and are probably incompetent. Oh, and by the way, blacks only constitute 12% of the population.

What has this meant? Well white enrollments have dropped 27% (up to 2005) and black enrollments have increased 23.8%.

Seems to be a universal truth; we will lower our standards and sacrifice our health in the name of egalitarianism. I guess Michael Jackson learnt the hard way.

As for South African shortages; I'm not surprised. As a white, if you need an IQ of 138 to gain admission to medical school, you would be snapped up, upon graduation, by any first world country. No wonder we don't see young physicians anymore.

But it is more than just IQ. I could tolerate a lower IQ if I was dealing with a doctor with other qualities such as empathy, altruism, tolerance, compassion and foresight.

These are highly developed qualities, that are strongly correlated with intelligence. Research is beginning to emerge that suggests that primitive cultures are lacking in these essential qualities; and you guessed it, they are inherited.

So in summary, stay away from black doctors (on average), and do not give in to state sponsored medical programmes.

Travelgate: How the ANC rewards those guilty of corruption

How the ANC rewards Travelgate guilty - DA

Mike Ellis says the parliament's fraudsters have continued to prosper

Travelgate: How the ANC rewards those guilty of corruption

Yesterday the ANC parliamentary caucus released a statement on Travelgate fraudster and Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans, Mnyamezeli Booi, in which it rejected the DA's call for Mr Booi to resign, saying it "smacked of political opportunism" and that the caucus was "satisfied by Booi's show of remorse and his co-operation with the judiciary in reaching the agreement".

Yesterday Mr Booi pleaded guilty to theft and was fined R50 000 or a five year jail term. He admitted to using R92 000 worth of travel vouchers for car rental and hotel accommodation worth R20 000.

In other words, Mr Booi defrauded Parliament, breached the good faith vested in him by the public and has dragged the process out for years; nevertheless, the ANC is happy to let Mr Booi continue in his position. He joins the ranks of the many other Travelgate fraudsters who now enjoy high-ranking positions in the ANC. And, once again, ANC bluster about accountability and a commitment to fighting corruption has come to nought.

When the scandal first broke the ANC national executive released a statement in which it stated, among other things, that the ANC would "institute disciplinary action against any of its MPs or other members found guilty of wrongdoing". It seems that it is not going to happen. In fact, the ANC seems to have gone out of its way to reward a great many of those found guilty of fraud. Below this statement is a list of a number of those Travelgate MPs who have either returned to Parliament, the provincial legislature or been given jobs by the ANC itself, subsequent to the scandal.

It is remarkable. Among the positions now held by a number of those found guilty of defrauding Parliament - the heart of South Africa's democracy - include:

• A Member of the Provincial Legislature
• Seven Members of Parliament
• A Deputy Minister
• Three Committee Chairpersons
• A Branch Treasurer
• A member of an ANC Disciplinary Committee
• Chair of the ANC Women's Caucus
• A member of the SADC Parliamentary Forum
• A whip for the Committees on the Auditor General and Ethics and Private Members' Legislative Proposals and Special Petitions.

Quite clearly, if you want to make it big in the ANC, you need to commit fraud and you will be appropriately rewarded.

In the press statement that accompanied the ANC's announcement of its 2009 list, the party stated "they have been told that their organisation, and the people they represent, will hold them to the highest standards of integrity and accountability."

In a word: Whatever.

The ANC wouldn't know what accountability looked like if it hit it over the head with a spade.

It continues to do everything in its power to do the exact opposite on the sentiments contained in the promise above: ignore the people, undermine the integrity of Parliament and systematically denude the Constitutional principle of accountability of its worth. Its attitude is disgraceful.

Jacob Zuma has spoken about creating an "ethos of accountability". More like a quagmire for the corrupt and arrogant.

Randy Pieterse Pleaded guilty to one count of theft (R60 000 service benefits) and was sentenced to a fine of R25 000 or 3 years imprisonment and a further 5 years imprisonment suspended conditionally for 5 years (16 October 2006)
Maintained as a Member of Parliament 10th on the ANC's WC Provincial List. Missed the cut by 2 positions. Employed full-time on the ANC's Western Cape Provincial Task Team

Patrick Maloyi Pleaded guilty to one count of fraud (R150 000 service benefits/ mileage claims) and sentenced to a fine of R60 000 or 5 years imprisonment and a further 5 years imprisonment suspended conditionally for 5 years. (16 October 2006)
Redeployed to the North West province in 2007 as the Chief Whip for the ANC in the Provincial Legislature. Elected in 9th position on the ANC's 2009 Provincial List for the North West. Touted as possible Premier. Member of the Provincial Legislature.

Barbara Thompson Pleaded guilty to one count of fraud (R170 000 service benefits/ mileage claims) and was sentenced to a fine of R90 000 or 5 years imprisonment and a further 5 years imprisonment suspended conditionally for 5 years. (16 October 2006) Retained as Member of Parliament. Elected back to Parliament in 2009, in position 48 on the ANC's national to national list. Member of the National Assembly. Elected Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth, Children and People with Disabilities. ANCWL Chairperson Ward 34 East branch; ANCWL REC; ANCWL PEC; ANCWL REC Disciplinary Committee; ANCWL PEC Gender and Development issues.

Beauty Dlulane Pleaded guilty to one count of fraud (R289 000 service benefits/ mileage claims) and was sentenced to a fine of R120 000 or 5 years imprisonment and a further 5 years imprisonment suspended conditionally for 5 years. Retained as a Member of Parliament. Appointed to the multi-party ad hoc committee deliberating on the recommendation of the President on the National Director of Public Prosecutions in January 2009. Served on the SADC parliamentary forum. Elected back to Parliament in 2009, in position 58 on the ANC's 2009 national to national list. Member of the NCOP. Chair of the Women's Caucus. Nominated to the SADC parliamentary forum. She is also a member of the Women League's national executive.

Jabu Sosibo Pleaded guilty to one charge of fraud (R241 000). Fined R100 000 or five years in jail, suspended for five years. Retained as Member of Parliament. Elected back to Parliament in 2009 on the ANC's provincial to national list. Member of the National Assembly. Elected as ANC whip for the Committees on the Auditor General, Constitutional Review, Ethics and Private Members' Legislative Proposals and Special Petitions. She is the treasurer of the ANC's Reservoir Hills branch.

Myamezeli Booi Pleaded guilty to one charge of fraud. Fined R50 000, or five years' jail, and given until January 2014 to pay the money in monthly instalments of R1000.
Retained as Member of Parliament. Elected back to Parliament in 2009 in position 65 on the ANC's national to national list. Member of the National Assembly. Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans.

Ndleleni Duma Pleaded guilty to one count of theft (R51 000 service benefits) and was sentenced to a fine of R30 000 or 3 years imprisonment and a further 5 years imprisonment suspended conditionally for 5 years Not elected back to Parliament in 2004.
Deployed to the North West Provincial Government, where he served as MEC for Sports, Arts and Culture. Elected back to Parliament in 2009, in position 79 on the ANC's national to national list. Member of the National Assembly.

Bathabile Dlamini Pleaded guilty to one count of fraud (R254 000 service benefits/ mileage claims) and was sentenced to a fine of R120 000 or 5 years imprisonment and a further 5 years imprisonment suspended conditionally for 5 years Not elected back to Parliament in 2004.
Elected back to Parliament in 2009, in position 16 on the ANC's national to national list. Member of the National Assembly. Deputy Minister of Social Development.

Angie Molebatsi Pleaded guilty to one charge of fraud. Fined R25 000, or three years in jail, plus an additional five years suspended Not elected back to Parliament in 2004.
Elected back to Parliament in 2009, in position 84 on the ANC's national to national list. Member of Parliament. Member of the Portfolio committee on Police.

Ruth Bhengu Pleased guilty to one charge of fraud (R43 000) Fined R45 000 or two years' imprisonment, and given a three-year suspended sentence.
Redeployed to Deputy Mayor of the Ugu District Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal. Elected back to Parliament in 2009, in position 96 on the ANC's national to national list. Member of the National Assembly. Elected chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Transport.

Statement issued by Mike Ellis, MP, Democratic Alliance deputy chief whip, September 30 2009

Opportunities in the medical field……

CAPE TOWN — Almost half the doctor and specialist posts in Free State hospitals are empty, according to a written reply to questions posed by the Democratic Alliance (DA) in Parliament.

The province is also battling to find nurses, dentists and physiotherapists, which is hampering essential services.

“It’s absolutely shocking. You can’t run a proper hospital system (like) this,” said DA health spokesman Mike Waters.

The health ministry’s response on health professionals employed by the Free State health department shows that only 417 of the 785 doctor and registrar posts are filled; 162 of the 313 specialist posts ; 2356 of the 3822 nurses posts ; and 54 of the 115 physiotherapists posts .

Waters said the DA suspected the high vacancy rate was due to poor budgeting. He said he had asked Parliament’s health committee to call the provincial and national health and treasury departments to account.

When I read this article on the shortages of medical personnel in the Free State, I realized that there are huge opportunities for BEE and equal employment, which for some or other reason, are not pursued.

There are already people that can step into these roles, namely Izinyanga.

Just so that there are no confusion on the capabilities of these individuals, and their qualifications, extracts from internet sources to clarify that.

Inyanga (literally "the man of the trees") is a Zulu word for a traditional healer.
Although the word sangoma is generally used in South African English to mean all types of traditional Southern African healers, inyangas and sangomas are in fact different. An inyanga is an herbalist who is concerned with medicines made from plants and animals, while a sangoma relies primarily on divination for healing purposes. The knowledge of the inyanga is passed through the generations from parent to child.

In modern society the status of these medicine men or women has been translated into wealth. Most izinyanga in urban areas have shops with consulting rooms where they sell their medicines.

iziNyanga are herbalists, and many of them have a truly good knowledge of many natural substances, which have a real remedial effect. Such medicines come from many different sources, one of these is the bark of certain trees. The Zulu word "umuthi" has a triple meaning: Tree, bark and medicine. It is frequently wrongly abbreviated as "Muti" by non-Zulu-speakers.

Gang of 20 attack mall

'A four-year-old girl was kicked in the face'

The robbery at VC Shopping Centre, a small complex in Dalview, Brakpan, has left many people shaken. This morning a manager explained how he had been confronted in his office by two robbers last night.

"They had guns, but they were pointing them down at the ground and they were screaming 'Money, money'. "I did what they told me to do, I took the safe keys and walked downstairs to where the safe is," said the manager who asked that his name not be published.

Visibly shaken, he described how the robbers took his watch and his cellphone from him as they followed him to the safe. "I opened the safe and gave them everything that was there. They then told me to lie down on the ground and they left." A few minutes later he called out to make sure that the robbers were gone.

Then he got up and started helping his staff. He said that staff and customers told him that the gang had entered the shop at about 6.45pm, posing as customers. Suddenly they pulled guns out and ordered the cashiers to open their tills. Some of them cleaned out the tills while others headed to the office. Everyone was made to lie down as the robbers proceeded to rob customers of their jewellery, watches, phones and wallets.

When it was over, customers left quickly. Another four shops in the centre - Yuppies Pizzeria and Grillhouse, Liquor City, Angelo's Supermarket and Hollywood Nites video shop - were all hit at the same time.

An eyewitness, who was eating takeaways in the parking lot, said he saw a group of men walking into the Spar. Minutes later he saw people lying on the ground and the men pointing guns. "Then I knew it was a robbery. I quickly took cover and hid under the car," said the man. Johan Thiart, a warder at Boksburg Correctional Services, was at the video shop when the robbers stormed in.

"When I turned around a man put a gun on my face. He ordered me to lie down on the floor," Thiart said. He said a four-year-old girl was kicked in the face by the robbers who instructed everybody in the shop to lie on the floor.

"They were shouting aggressively at the cashier demanding money. I was lying face down. I saw about five men. The whole thing lasted for about five minutes," he said. This morning, Elize Spice was at Brakpan police station to collect her handbag which was recovered by the police from inside the Toyota Quantum minibus.

"I'm so glad everything is in there. Even the R200 my boss had given me." An FNB safe, pizzas, R22 000 in cash, cigarettes, two cellphones and three firearms were also found in the bus. The VC Spar was robbed in June this year.

An employee who survived the June robbery collapsed last night after this latest attack. She did not return to work today.

Counseling had been organized for all the staff. Lamola said cases of business robbery and murder have been opened and are being investigated. Police have interrogated the three men arrested for leads as to the remaining members of the gang. They will also attempt to link them to other violent robberies.

The toll gate was quiet today with little evidence of last night's mayhem.

What the English publications once again fail to mention is that a innocent motorist was shot and killed when these thugs stole his car. Or is this of no importance?

Motoris vermoor toe rowers vlug (motorist killed as robbers fled)

Is this just another deliberate attempt by the MSM in South Africa to hide the crime from possible 2010 supporters?

Dave Matthews' Politics of Racial Paranoia

By Joseph Lindsey (Big Hollywood)

“Honky,” “cracker,” “whitey,” “spot,” “the white guy” and “my white nigga” are a few of the words and phrases used to describe me by fellow co-workers (along with a few white jokes told to my face on the set of a film) I co-starred in called “Caught Up” in 1998. I was in fact the only principal white actor on a set dominated by black actors, a black director, a black writer and a predominantly black crew. Not once did I think I was being treated in a racist manor. I just felt it was okay for blacks to describe me this way having been led to believe that I owed them this bit of racial jabbing because I, as a white individual, had something to do with the racism they’d experienced throughout their lives.

If the tables had been turned and a predominantly white cast and crew used such racially charged language to describe a black cast member, the Screen Actors Guild would have invaded that production and we would have seen headlines in the media “Racist Cast and Crew, Film Shut Down By SAG.”

In that film one of my scripted lines required that I use the word “nigger.” Before I shot the scene I pulled my fellow actor aside and assured him that this was not a word I took lightly and that I was aware of its historical implications towards blacks. He looked me over as if I were an alien and said “Give me a break, I don’t give shit, I’ve been a nigger all my life. I’m cool with it.” That response came to me as a mixed signal. Not one that said it was okay for me to use the word “nigger,” but one that said my efforts at trying to understand his side of race didn’t matter.

All us “white people” are now being told by the media, by former Presidents and now singer Dave Matthews that most whites have a negative racial element to their behavior, that we should monitor them and keep them in check, that our attitudes towards blacks should be sensitive. Okay, fair enough. However, lots of us so called “white people” live our lives with a sense of racial sensitivity and have for some time.

What could be helpful in having a racial dialogue would be specific feedback from the black community on what more they want us to do when it comes to understanding racism as they see it. That would be a more constructive approach to the topic than simply finger-pointing at “White America” as Dave Matthews did when he recently said this:

“Of course it is! I found there’s a fairly blatant racism in America that’s already there, and I don’t think I noticed it when I lived here as a kid. But when I went back to South Africa, and then it’s sort of thrust in your face, and then came back here — I just see it everywhere. There’s a good population of people in this country that are terrified of the president only because he’s black, even if they don’t say it. And I think a lot of them, behind closed doors, do say it.

“Maybe I’m paranoid about it, but I don’t think someone who disagreed as strongly as they do with Obama — if it was Clinton — would have stood up and screamed at him during his speech. (Shakes his head) I don’t think so.”

Where is Dave Matthews meeting these “blatant racist Americans?” Is it amongst his adoring fans, or is this just happening inside his liberal head brought on by the white guilt he cultivated living in South Africa? We disagreed with Clinton over some of his policies, we also scream at him for lying to us when we discovered he’d used the Oval Office as his own private porn booth/cigar factory.

When are those in the black community and its leaders going to address the fact that the vast majority of “white people” in this country try to do what’s right when it comes to race, that when we disagree with it doesn’t mean it has something to do with the color of someone’s skin, but may have to do with the content of the individuals character or views?

It’s time self-hating whites with big bullhorns like Jimmy Carter and Dave Matthews stop pointing the finger and start asking questions of the black community about what they’re doing to put a balanced eye on the topic, because if they are, I can’t see it.

Unqualified leadership

From Eddie Botha (Daily Dispatch Online)

If Phat Joe goes and Chuene stays there is something twisted about SA’s morality - Michael Trapido

That Athletics South Africa (ASA) president Leonard Chuene is still in his job is unacceptable. Last week, writing from Atlanta in the US, and humiliated by the US TV networks’ highlights of the lies Chuene told about the gender tests conducted on 800m world champion Caster Semenya, I called for his head.

I find myself in good company. Even the Ministry of Sport called on ASA “to fire him from his position as the president of ASA”.

“If they fail to do so, they will be running the risk of being led by a liar,” deputy minister of sport Gert Oosthuizen said.

Oosthuizen, a remnant from the old Nat party and now a converted ANC member, must have had the blessing of Luthuli House to make such a statement.

That brings us to the question of leadership within the party, which has always stressed the strength and importance of its collective decision-making process.

Why then, if the party feels so strongly about ridding ASA of a lying official who has embarrassed the country, does it tolerate a total nitwit such as Julius Malema, the leader of the ANC’s Youth League?

If Malema is the best the party can offer to lead (?) its youth, then God help South Africa. What makes Malema’s position on the centre stage even more laughable, if not tragic, are his statements on the Semenya affair. This was a moment too good for the slippery tongue of Malema to ignore.

As Alex Perry, the South African-based correspondent of Time magazine, noted: “The manner in which South Africa defended Semenya only underlines how obsessed with difference the country remains.”

Perry was referring to Malema’s statement that the issue was not gender but race.

“Semenya was a victim of white officials, white media and unpatriotic white South Africans.”

Unpatriotic South Africans? Well, I for one, and I am sure I speak for the majority of white South Africans, had never heard of Semenya before the Berlin race.

The white media? Who is Malema referring to? Avusa? The Independent group? The Caxton newspapers? Media24? He has yet to specify which white media group he meant.

White officials? As far as I know only the disgraced Chuene has been exposed as the official, who single-handedly embarrassed South Africa and is probably responsible for wrecking the career of a young athlete.

Is it not ironic that Malema and Chuene’s statements sounded like an orchestrated effort to discredit white South Africans?

In the midst of the storm surrounding Semenya’s gender issue Chuene said the speculation had started in South Africa.

“I have proof of it.... We will not allow that Europeans describe our children. They are our children.”

But we now know that he is a self-confessed liar. He has no honour.

Hopefully Oosthuizen and his party will deal with Chuene. ASA has failed to do so.

But what about Malema? Can the party really afford to allow a man in their midst, who at the slightest opportunity grabs the chance to make racial accusations against people, who have not fled the country and who are keen and eager to work for the prosperity of all its peoples?

Can it really afford someone who uses his under-qualifications to speak disparagingly of rape victims to lead its youth? I am, of course, referring to Malema’s own confession that his lack of tertiary education was responsible for his alleged hate speech during an election rally where he said that President Jacob Zuma’s rape accuser “had a nice time”.

Pleading ignorance in the case, which was brought against him by the Sonke Gender Justice Network, Malema said he was a “layman” and merely quoting from a High Court judgment.

He only had a matric qualification and could not quote the judgment verbatim.

“You must know that you are talking to a layman whose highest qualification is matric, who is trying to remember a judgment which was passed three years back.”

But is this “layman” qualified to accuse innocent fellow South Africans of racism?

Is he qualified to lead the ANC Youth League? I don’t think so.

# Eddie Botha is Daily Dispatch Investigations Editor

The Next Culture War in the US

By David Brooks (The New York Times)

Centuries ago, historians came up with a classic theory to explain the rise and decline of nations. The theory was that great nations start out tough-minded and energetic. Toughness and energy lead to wealth and power. Wealth and power lead to affluence and luxury. Affluence and luxury lead to decadence, corruption and decline.

“Human nature, in no form of it, could ever bear prosperity,” John Adams wrote in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, warning against the coming corruption of his country.

Yet despite its amazing wealth, the United States has generally remained immune to this cycle. American living standards surpassed European living standards as early as 1740. But in the U.S., affluence did not lead to indulgence and decline.

That’s because despite the country’s notorious materialism, there has always been a countervailing stream of sound economic values. The early settlers believed in Calvinist restraint. The pioneers volunteered for brutal hardship during their treks out west. Waves of immigrant parents worked hard and practiced self-denial so their children could succeed. Government was limited and did not protect people from the consequences of their actions, thus enforcing discipline and restraint.

When economic values did erode, the ruling establishment tried to restore balance. After the Gilded Age, Theodore Roosevelt (who ventured west to counteract the softness of his upbringing) led a crackdown on financial self-indulgence. The Protestant establishment had many failings, but it was not decadent. The old WASPs were notoriously cheap, sent their children to Spartan boarding schools, and insisted on financial sobriety.

Over the past few years, however, there clearly has been an erosion in the country’s financial values. This erosion has happened at a time when the country’s cultural monitors were busy with other things. They were off fighting a culture war about prayer in schools, “Piss Christ” and the theory of evolution. They were arguing about sex and the separation of church and state, oblivious to the large erosion of economic values happening under their feet.

Evidence of this shift in values is all around. Some of the signs are seemingly innocuous. States around the country began sponsoring lotteries: government-approved gambling that extracts its largest toll from the poor. Executives and hedge fund managers began bragging about compensation packages that would have been considered shameful a few decades before. Chain restaurants went into supersize mode, offering gigantic portions that would have been considered socially unacceptable to an earlier generation.

Other signs are bigger. As William Galston of the Brookings Institution has noted, in the three decades between 1950 and 1980, personal consumption was remarkably stable, amounting to about 62 percent of G.D.P. In the next three decades, it shot upward, reaching 70 percent of G.D.P. in 2008.

During this period, debt exploded. In 1960, Americans’ personal debt amounted to about 55 percent of national income. By 2007, Americans’ personal debt had surged to 133 percent of national income.

Over the past few months, those debt levels have begun to come down. But that doesn’t mean we’ve re-established standards of personal restraint. We’ve simply shifted from private debt to public debt. By 2019, federal debt will amount to an amazing 83 percent of G.D.P. (before counting the costs of health reform and everything else). By that year, interest payments alone on the federal debt will cost $803 billion.

These may seem like dry numbers, mostly of concern to budget wonks. But these numbers are the outward sign of a values shift. If there is to be a correction, it will require a moral and cultural movement.

Our current cultural politics are organized by the obsolete culture war, which has put secular liberals on one side and religious conservatives on the other. But the slide in economic morality afflicted Red and Blue America equally.

If there is to be a movement to restore economic values, it will have to cut across the current taxonomies. Its goal will be to make the U.S. again a producer economy, not a consumer economy. It will champion a return to financial self-restraint, large and small.

It will have to take on what you might call the lobbyist ethos — the righteous conviction held by everybody from AARP to the agribusinesses that their groups are entitled to every possible appropriation, regardless of the larger public cost. It will have to take on the self-indulgent popular demand for low taxes and high spending.

A crusade for economic self-restraint would have to rearrange the current alliances and embrace policies like energy taxes and spending cuts that are now deemed politically impossible. But this sort of moral revival is what the country actually needs.

Even Jon Stewart laughing at western threats towards Iran

He's particularly funny in this one.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Pittsburgh Irates

From Titans To Lemmings: The Suicide Of The White Race - Part VI

First published at The Home of the Green Arrow


The title of this series of essays "From Titans To Lemmings - The Suicide of the White Race" reflects in a nutshell what I believe to be THE biggest problem facing Western civilisation at this moment in time, that being, the white race itself. Like it or not, since the end of World War II, the white race as a whole has willingly chosen to behave in ways that are self-destructive; flawed ways that fly in the face of Mother nature as I have been describing throughout the series, but one perhaps stands out as the most destructive of all:

An almost fanatical religious belief in the Marxist-created Multicultural ideology and the imposing of multi-racial societies throughout the West where various races will live together as equals in peace and harmony. This modern-day Godless religion has been adopted by the vast majority of whites in the Western world who are enthusiastically swallowing hook, line and sinker the blissful fantasy of a rainbow Shangri-la.

Towards the end of the previous essay, From Titans To Lemmings Part 5, I stated that the Multicutural ideology has been force-fed to our people at every level of our society. For the last fifty years, equality of the races has been widely promoted throughout the West as hordes of immigrants flooded into our lands. Along with equality of all, a demonising of the white man and a re-writing of his history to portray him as an evil tyrant who looted the wealth of other weaker races while enslaving and oppressing them has placed what I call "the Mother of all guilt trips" on our people to brainwash them into accepting the colonisation of their homelands.

Dissent simply isn't tolerated and those who dare resist the propaganda and speak out against Multiculturalism will then be de-humanised with a myriad of Orwellian thought and hate crimes: Fascist, Hater, Nazi, and of course the worst sin any disbeliever can commit against the Liberal church, Racist, the modern-day heretic of the Godless, Multicultural religion.

But something is rotten in Denmark, Sweden, France, Holland, USA, Great Britain - every Western nation. Whites throughout the West have now had fifty years of being brow-beaten with the Multicultural "all races are equal" ideology. Fifty long years of watching their nations become colonised by millions of aliens flooding into the West; fifty years since the end of colonial rule in Africa; fifty long years since the civil rights movement won equality for blacks in the United States and fifty years of a resurgent Islam with millions of Muslims bringing their retarded faith to our once mighty nations.

For British nationalists, we've had fifty years of enduring a pernicious social experiment being forcibly imposed by an elite who never gave their own people a choice in the matter and who demonised and vilified opponents whose only crime was to speak-out against the enforced colonisation of their nation.

So after fifty years, why don't we put this Multicultural social experiment and its claim of racial equality in the dock? Because behind the smiling rainbow mask lies millions of smashed lives mercilessly sacrificed for the Multicultural dream and in this essay, I want to expose one of the most destructive myths being vehemently asserted by deceitful Liberal/Multiculturalists:
That the black man is the equal of the white man. The ocean of evidence - much of which is deeply distressing - clearly demonstrates that this assertion is nothing more than an outright lie that is causing immense suffering to both whites and blacks alike.

And it's way past tea for this lie and the enormous suffering it is causing to be exposed under the spotlight of uncomfortable truth. What follows is the horrific reality festering behind the rainbow mask, a barbaric, savage and brutal reality the Liberals and Multiculturalists deliberately ignore, a reality they'd rather you didn't see.

Dawn Of A New Man

In 1950, the United Nations Educational and Scientific Organisation - UNESCO - declared that "All men belong to the same species: Homo Sapiens". Thus the crux of Multiculturalism was spawned, the belief in equality of all races, that all humans are the same followed by the quite ridiculous assertion that race is purely a social construct. Talk about putting the cart before the horse.

In the sixty years since this declaration, the world has witnessed dramatic changes and in Africa, the "Dark Continent", these past sixty years have seen the end of white colonial rule with African nations now ruled and governed by the native black peoples. As Africa has moved towards self-rule, millions of African blacks have left their homelands to build new lives in the affluent West, a West that offers them equal status and equal opportunity and a share of its wealth within its now Multicultural rainbow societies.

Let's review then these sixty years to see just how equal the races truly are, in this case the black race and the white race by looking at the lands of the West AND the lands of Africa, in particular the former British crown colony of Southern Rhodesia and the former British dominion of South Africa.

Slaying A Titan

If you're old enough to remember the late Sixties and the early Seventies, cast your mind back and recall how the issue of apartheid in South Africa was a prominent news item. Reports about how blacks were forced to live in poverty and squalor in shacks in the townships and who were denied opportunity in their own land were embellished with accounts of Police brutality and government oppression. Depictions of racial segregation in public places further illustrated how the South African black was being oppressed by evil whites, with South African whites dehumanised as evil racists who were cruelly oppressing their fellow human beings.

Musicians refused to tour South Africa "I don't wanna play Sun City" they defiantly sang whilst sportsmen and women refused to take part in events in South Africa. Perhaps the most famous incident occurred in 1974, an incident that highlighted the nauseating greed and hypocrisy of politicians who had demanded that the British Lions cancel their tour of South Africa, citing apartheid as the reason.

The Lions ignored them, and with some magnificent displays of rugby became the first touring side to win a test series in South Africa in the 20th Century. Captained by Willie John McBride, the Lions refused to be intimidated by the normally effective "rough-house" approach of the Springboks and McBride's tactic of meeting aggression with outright violence through the call that defined the tour "99", whereby on hearing this each Lion was to hit the nearest Springbok gave the once invincible South Africans the biggest shock of their lives.

The Lions' victory was a truly magnificent achievement and the British politicians who had vilified the Lions for this tour suddenly changed their tune and made sure they welcomed back the triumphant Lions to bask in reflected glory. Such is the nature of the cunning, power-hungry politician.

Graphic reports of violence in the townships, especially Soweto, featured heavily in television news broadcasts and spawned the icons that defined the black struggle against apartheid, the main one being of course the black terrorist - make that Saint - Nelson Mandela.

All the time the emphasis was on portraying South Africa as a racist state that brutally oppressed blacks to make South Africa a pariah on the international stage. Finally, after much international pressure, 1994 saw the end of white rule in South Africa and under the black Saint the new "rainbow nation" was born.

Saint Nelson announced the new state to the world thus:

"We enter into a covenant that we shall build a society in which all South Africans, both black and white, will be able to walk tall, without any fear in their hearts, assured of their inalienable right to human dignity- a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world."

Fine words. But that's all they are - words. What is the reality of the rainbow nation for both black and white and has it lived up to the lofty and noble goal of a rainbow nation at peace with itself?

Compare and Contrast

Before we look at today's South Africa, let's first remember what South Africa was like under white rule. Under white rule, South Africa was a prosperous, first-world country boasting magnificent cities such as Johannesburg, Cape Town and Durban, cities complete with first-class medical care, advanced transport systems, superb communications infrastructures and magnificent architecture.

South Africa also created a flourishing agricultural industry that not only fed its own people, South African farmers also helped feed the rest of Africa and South African wines earned a reputation as being among the very best wines available in the world. This is a nation blessed with an abundance of natural resources and South African gold and diamonds, again of the very highest quality, earned South Africa enormous wealth. Along with an excellent judicial system that kept crime firmly in check, the old South Africa stood out as the most advanced nation in Africa, a nation that compared favourably with ANY other first-world nation.

When the blacks came to power in 1994, they were handed on a platter this gem of Africa. Having watched the white man apply his ingenuity and his industry to solve the problems presented to him by Mother nature, the South African blacks inherited a superb, advanced nation without them having to build it. All they had to do was maintain it and if possible, build upon it and improve it to benefit all people, black and white alike.

Yet in just FIFTEEN years, black rule has turned the nation of South Africa into a crime ridden, degenerating, crumbling and stinking cesspit, whose cities are in decay, just take a look for yourself to see how two of the cities named above have fared under black rule:

Johannesburg Then And Now

In particular, check out the "A Tour Through Hillbrow" section and if you have time, read through the comments. Imagine how you'd feel if this was once your community. Many Britons will see the same thing happen to their communities, indeed, many have seen it already. Where black goes, Africa soon follows.

Durban Then And Now.

The webmaster there asserts: "Durban is now a filthy squatter camp". See the evidence he presents and judge for yourself.

These images - rarely if ever shown in the duplicitous Western media - are damning evidence of just how unequal the white and black race are. If you listen to Liberal apologists, they will tell you that blacks live in such filth and squalor in these cities because of the legacy of apartheid, yet again placing the blame at the door of the white man for the black man's abject failure. But let's get real here, we're all equal right?

No matter what has happened in the past how on earth does that excuse ANY race ANY people ANYWHERE for living in filth that they have created? We're talking about two of the finest cities created by man handed to blacks on a platter and that blacks have allowed them to decay and to become nothing more than garbage dumps where they raise their children casts a huge shadow of doubt on the belief in equality because if blacks can't manage basic cleanliness then the equality assertion falls at the first hurdle. And what price pride and dignity?

Such filth and decay aren't solely evident in South African cities. You could also see the same decay in Nairobi, London, Birmingham, Manchester, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and especially, Detroit. Many others too but I will leave you to investigate and discover for yourself but the mess in Detroit is particularly shocking.

What if we reversed the situation and forced whites out of their cities and into the townships to dwell in shacks? Do you think whites would make these townships decay - if that is possible - or do you think that there is a very good chance that whites would dramatically improve these places?

The hypocrisy of lilly-livered Liberals who blame whites for these conditions is sickening because when blacks lived in the shack-riddled townships, these bleeding heart Liberals castigated whites for their "criminal oppression". Whites have built fine cities, built a magnificent nation, handed it all to blacks and when blacks bring the squalor of the townships to these once first-class cities, whites are once again blamed for something that ended years ago, a lame excuse that has no bearing on how black people are CHOOSING to live in the present.

Such typically anti-white Liberal behaviour is yet more evidence of inequality. If the races are truly equal, then all should be judged by the same standards without exception. Of course, Liberals refuse to do so because if they did their whole claim of equality would lie in tatters as reality continually highlights the failures of the black race. The Liberal answer then is to blame it all on whites. How cute.

But the deterioration and squalor of South African cities is just the "ears of the hippo". The savage barbarity blacks are committing throughout the nation of South Africa, not just to whites but also to their own people, is a suppressed truth that needs to be spread to as many as possible. Because what is going on in South Africa is also creeping into the West and in fact, the root cause of what is destroying South Africa is also the same root cause that is destroying the West including Great Britain - Cultural Marxism.

Law Of The Jungle

During the time of apartheid, South Africa was depicted as the most racist and evil nation on planet earth. Once black rule became reality and signalled the end of apartheid you would think that peace and harmony would reign in the rainbow nation. Think again.

Let's get some facts down about apartheid. Apartheid was a system of racial and legal segregation introduced by the governing National Party in 1948 and it lasted until the end of white rule in 1994. During these 46 years, a total of 21,000 blacks were killed due to political violence but this figure doesn't paint a true picture. Because out of these 21,000 deaths, 14,000 of them occurred between 1990 and 1993 as the country transitioned towards black rule.

Of these 14,000, 92% of them, were due to black on black violence, mostly tribal for territory and only 514 of them were down to South African security forces. Further, between 1948 and 1989, 7000 blacks were killed, the majority of them as they committed criminal acts, namely armed robbery, rape or assaults.

Life for blacks under apartheid was a far cry from the unjust and oppressive picture painted by white-hating Liberal-Multiculturalists who never mention just how much blacks benefited under apartheid, check out this two minute video that busts the Liberal myths:

Myths of Apartheid

So surely, things must be better post-apartheid, right? Let's see.

Crime is now totally out of control with an unbelievable murder rate of between 50 - 140 murders EVERY DAY. Violent robberies committed against whites are an almost daily occurrence and the extreme levels of violence and brutality against the victims is absolutely appalling. From biting off fingers or cutting them off with scissors or shears to remove rings to torture with red-hot irons to obtain money, the brutality has no bounds. But what is even more alarming is that once the money or valuables have been obtained, many victims have either been badly beaten, raped - both husband and wife - repeatedly or executed with a bullet to the head or even tied up and burned alive.

Liberals assert that the rampant crime is caused by poverty but this begs the question: Why are whites battered, raped and murdered AFTER giving the robbers what they wanted? I suggest it isn't poverty that leads to these horrors being committed it is racial hatred that brokers no compassion for the victims whatsoever. And the media and the world's governments, so vehemently critical of apartheid, say nothing of this inhumane savagery.

They don't even report that in the shack-ridden townships, ALL crime is committed by blacks against blacks. These are townships policed by black vigilante groups whose punishments include whipping, beating and burning their fellow black brothers who they deem guilty of committing a crime.

In addition to the out-of-control crime levels, there is also an ongoing genocide against the Boer farming community with over 3000 Boers murdered by blacks since 1994 and to its shame, the world turns its back on these victims, preferring instead to perpetrate the myths of apartheid. This SKY news report shows how these farmers have to live and the horrific brutality they are suffering:

Boers Murdered In South Africa

If you listen very carefully to the black politician who dismisses the genocide of the Boers as the actions of criminal elements, you will hear him mention a word - a lie - that betrays the envious reason at the root of these vile atrocities. I will leave you to judge for yourself without giving any more away and you'll find more links to the right of the video providing more information about this diabolical crime against humanity.

No Place For Innocence

But perhaps the most shocking statistic of all concerns child abuse. In the rainbow nation of South Africa, 530 children are raped every day with a staggering 23,450 children raped in the last year alone, that is ONE CHILD RAPE EVERY THREE MINUTES. Over 1000 children were murdered and 20,870 were assaulted during this time, many of whom had body parts - lips, ears, genitalia and internal organs - removed for making traditional black African "Muti" medicine.

Here's a distressing report about child abuse in the rainbow nation over on the excellent South Africa Sucks blog, a blog that is revealing the truth about what is happening there. Warning: Some of the images on the page are graphic and disturbing:

Child Abuse In South Africa

When you then discover that there are over 10,000 child prostitutes on the streets of Johannesburg and that children are also being sold as sex slaves in Bloemfontein, Port Elizabeth, Durban and Cape Town, then the scale of child abuse in the rainbow nation is simply astronomical.

Just before I completed this essay, I read this report dated 9/9/09 over on WMD.COM and astonishingly, the heinous child abuse perpetrated by African blacks is plumbing new depths of depravity:

Babies Raped To Cure AIDS

How on earth any race that treats its young in such a savage, diabolical manner can be regarded as human never mind equal to other human races I have no idea.

Another Titan Falls

If things are bad and deteriorating daily in South Africa, then they are utterly catastrophic in Zimbabwe, the former British Colony of Southern Rhodesia. Since the end of white rule there in 1980 and the establishment of the black ruled nation of Zimbabwe, a once strong and advanced nation has totally imploded and the similarities with its neighbour South Africa are a damning indictment both on the African black and the self-righteous Liberal-Multiculturalists who blindly insist that the races are equal.

Did you know that Rhodesia used to be referred to as "The bread basket of Africa"? Here we had a nation whose white farmers were so industrious and so successful they not only fed ALL of Rhodesia's people, they created so much surplus they helped to feed an entire continent!

Look at it now. Under the rule of the dictator Robert Mugabe, a man who has no problem whatsoever with executing and persecuting blacks who oppose him - his own people -, the Zimbabwean economy has deteriorated into an absolute shambles.

The land reform program, the process by which land was stolen from white owners and handed over to blacks, has achieved the not-so-enviable feat of turning the country from a net exporter of food with an industry that employed 400,000 people into a net importer of food. This insanity has now lead to a severe famine in Zimbabwe with an estimated 5 million people now facing malnutrition and starvation. On top of this, water shortages are causing a cholera epidemic.

Due to the complete inability to effectively manage their own nation, Zimbabwe under black rule now suffers from hyper-inflation, with the dizzy height of 11.2 Million % being reached in 2008. From US$1 buying 80 Zimbabwean cents at the time black rule was established in 1980 to its current rate of around US$1 = Z$50 million with the desperate spectacle of a loaf of bread costing SEVEN MILLION Zimbabwean dollars, under black rule, Zimbabwe has collapsed into a dysfunctional state with devastating consequences for ALL of its people with yet more pain and suffering piling on the misery.

All underpinned by the Western Liberal-Multiculturalists who stood by and watched whites being ethnically cleansed from their homeland and who propagated the despicable lie that this was right and fitting because of the horrors inflicted on the African black under colonial rule. In typical arrogant and self-righteous Liberal style, once whitey has been kicked out of his land, these paragons of virtue completely ignore the devastating consequences being endured by black African people whose empty bellies know all too well the difference between living under white rule and black rule.

Not that your cappuccino drinking, sushi nibbling devout Liberal-Multiculturalist will ever take the rainbow glasses off and see the reality they've helped to create. For these naive well-fed dreamers, the Multicultural fantasy is their sole raison d' etre and when reality unfolds in stark contrast to the rainbow utopia, they will simply put their ideology first and disconnect from reality because they simply cannot bear to confront it. Truth hurts, especially when its brutal.

That these people are afforded the luxury of avoiding any responsibility or accountability for their misguided and irresponsible actions is an absolute disgrace. Yes I know many of them are acting with good intentions but you and I both know a certain road that's paved with them. South Africa and Zimbabwe are strewn with these roads and millions of people there are living in the harsh, brutal destination all of these roads lead to.

What is important to realise about this all-too short appraisal of black rule in South Africa and Zimbabwe is that the same game that destroyed these once mighty Titans is now being played throughout the West including our nation, Great Britain.

Besmirching Britannia

Just as the white South Africans were made to pay for the injustice of apartheid and just as white Rhodesians were ethnically cleansed from their land to right the wrongs of colonialism, so too are British whites made to feel guilty because of Britain's role in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Indeed, such is the determination of our Marxist enemies to deploy the guilt weapon, Britons who had nothing to do with slavery whatsoever were so bullied, intimidated and burdened by this guilt trip they marched in chains, led by a British politician, the rotund hypocritical Labour MP John "two Jags" Prescott. He certainly doesn't know what an empty belly feels like.

If the hypocrisy and cowardice doesn't make you vomit, here's the BBC report of this shameful event that happened in March 2007, a full two hundred years after the abolition of slavery:

Prescott's Apologists For Slavery

Note the organiser's risible "as we seek to undo the damage caused by the slave trade..." guilt-inducing nonsense, not missing the chance to hammer home the myths about the slave trade. What these self-hating dolts never mention is that African blacks were not just victims of the slave trade, they were actively involved in the slave trade by capturing and then selling their own. Nor is the fact that slavery is also rife in Africa itself, where albinos, dwarves and people from other tribes are enslaved by African blacks and always have been.

What rankles with me is pious Liberals banging on and on about how evil whites were for enslaving blacks but never mention the appalling conditions many of their forefathers were forced to work under at that time in their own country Great Britain. But as their forefathers were white, their exploitation is left in the cold shadows while the rainbow spotlight focuses on maximising the "injustice and horror" of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.

But tellingly, those who continually remind us of the wrongs Britain committed during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade don't mention the fact that by far the worst enslavers of blacks isn't the white race it is the Arab race who enslaved blacks for the best part of 1400 years. Indeed, blacks who converted to Islam aided the Muslim Arabs to enslave their own people. Arabs refer to black slaves as "abid" and these slaves were treated barbarically, from castrating the males to using the women as sex-slaves, and a shocking 85% of these people would die as a result of slavery.

Contrast this with the fact that 90% of blacks captured during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade survived and it begs the question:

Why is it blacks, egged on by irrational Liberal-Multiculturalists, continually bleat about the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, using it as a brick-bat to portray the white man as inherently racist and to demand never-ending reparations for this injustice yet do not apply this to their brutal Arab slave-masters? The Trans-Atlantic slave trade lasted for the best part of 300 years and it was brought to an end by whites themselves, so why is it blacks don't have the same anger and sense of injustice about the Arab slave trade that they have towards whites?

Maybe the fact that you will never find Arabs marching in chains through their cities to apologise for enslaving blacks offers a little clue. Guilt won't work on the Arabs but blacks know it works like a charm on whites and blacks will blame whites as much as possible, from slavery to racism to apartheid to colonialism all to distract from their own severe shortcomings and to extract as much value from whites as is possible.

That whites are so easily manipulated by this insidious guilt weapon is further evidence to support my assertion that it is the white race that is behaving in self-destructive ways amounting to suicide of the species.

A Bitter Pill

It is time for whites to refrain from meekly accepting this guilt-trip, a guilt-trip that damages blacks as much as it damages the white race, and to stand up and speak the truth. Enough of the lies, enough of the deceit and the manipulation and enough of this naive and futile devotion to a seriously flawed, childish ideology that forces truth to be sacrificed on the altar of Multiculturalism in the pursuit of a fantasy that cannot ever become a reality: Racial equality, especially equality between whites and blacks.

If one studies history, it becomes clear that wherever the white man has taken root, he has used his ingenuity and his industry to assess and then solve the problems presented to him by Mother nature. History is cram-packed with innovations that have taken mankind forward in leaps and bounds: Agriculture, Science, Medicine, Engineering, Technology along with efficient systems of governance and the rule of law.

What is glaring is that there is absolutely nothing invented or created by the African black that has advanced mankind in any significant way. I cannot think of ONE single invention that has made my life much more comfortable, much more pleasant or made work much more efficient that has been invented by the African black.

In contrast, look at what the white man brought to Africa, from flourishing agriculture to vibrant commerce to medicines that helped the black man combat many of the illnesses that blight the dark continent - malaria, cholera, dysentery, yellow fever, typhoid fever - do you like me wonder how many black Africans have benefited from the wonders of the white man's medicine?

Indeed, the current disease blighting Africa, especially South Africa is HIV/AIDS and in what can only be described as a quite astonishing and grossly irresponsible action, the ruling black ANC government advised people to have a shower after sex so they didn't contract HIV/AIDS. Is this a sign of equality? Really?

I assert that blacks know all too well that they cannot compete as equals with the white race. They know full well - and many are finding out to their great cost - that left to themselves, black societies degenerate into chaos and catastrophe. Blacks know that whites produce the wealth they are wholly incapable of creating and this arouses an intense racial hatred for whites in the black race that manifests in violent crimes such as the robberies described above or in the repulsive and demeaning gang rape of white women.

Yet still these retarded incompetents blame it all on the white man because that's all blacks can think of. So bereft are they of any creativity at all, the only answer blacks can think of when asked as to why Africa remains a third-world sewer is "eiish, cuz da wyt stole everything and oppressed us, das why we got entitlemunt to everything." What utter nonsense.

Blacks will always blame whites for their many failures and they will always demand a share of what the white man creates because they just cannot sustain themselves otherwise. Should whitey refuse they scream "WAYCISS!" like little children scream "I hate you!" when Mummy refuses to give them sweets at the supermarket checkout.

Instead of giving them a share of its wealth in return for nothing the white race should demand that blacks to do something to earn a share or leave them to get on with it in their own dark continent and let Mother nature take care of them. Which she most certainly will if stupid, pious, bleeding heart white Liberals can resist the urge to interfere and stop treating the black to a title blacks can never earn: The white man's equal.

If the white race fails to understand that continually allowing itself to be manipulated into handing over its wealth then not only will it hasten its own demise, it will also continue to cause African blacks enormous suffering. Not just through black incompetence but also through violence because black not only bears a seething hatred for whites, a fierce tribal mentality leads blacks to inflicting even greater acts of savagery and horror on their own people. And this occurs wherever black goes as Londoners know all too well.

Sick Dependency

Here's a couple of examples that illustrate how handing over wealth to Africans who have not earned it and who believe they are entitled to it either because of colonial rule, slavery or merely for the fact they can manage to breathe air, actually causes more misery and suffering and just prolongs the problem. I could provide hundreds more and I am not exaggerating.

In 1984 & `85, Bob Geldof and Midge Ure highlighted the famine in Ethiopia and along with the major rock and pop stars of the time, launched an appeal to raise money for the victims. Band Aid and Live Aid literally rocked the world, it was an amazing feat but what did it achieve? In 1985 the population of Ethiopia was around 35 million, today, just 25 years later, it is at 70 million and growing. This in a country with very little arable land, a country blighted by political corruption, war and famine, yet Saint Bob screamed at us:

"Give us yer money people are f**king dying!"

No Bob, drop the word "dying" and then realise that for all your good intentions all that's been achieved is to line the pockets of the corrupt rulers there and instead of alleviating the suffering of the people, it's actually increased it.

Saint Bob isn't the only one. There are a myriad of charities that exist to improve the lot of the African people. Many find out the hard way that blacks have little appreciation or gratitude for it, a good example being the Irish charity Niall Mellon Township Trust who built basic brick houses for South African blacks, all funded by donations from the West, handed over the keys to people who had paid nothing for them and who did very little to aid in constructing them and who, once whitey had cleared off, rented them out to their own people and returned to the shacks and pocketed the cash.

Charity Homes Rented Out

Other Liberals pay a far higher price for placing fantasy before reality such as this poor woman here:

Missionary Meets Reality

Allowing people to believe they can have something for nothing creates a sick dependency and is certainly not a noble virtue because it does nothing to help the receiver, it just keeps them down with the giver feeling a misguided superior sense of moral piety and an inflated ego. The barbaric and savage events that occur each year in Africa demonstrate how badly flawed this approach is. Another question concerns what happens to people who are wholly dependent on handouts should the handouts stop?

Why is it that after all of the aid that has been donated to Africa through God-knows how many charities and after white colonial rule had created infrastructure, systems of governance, agriculture, wealth-generating and thriving commerce and introduced advanced medical care that has helped cure people of many of the diseases inherent to the continent, why why why are people in Africa still living in squalor and filth and committing so much barbarity?

Additionally and importantly we can also ask: Why are swarms of African blacks still leaving their homelands and their people to live in the West? Surely a better approach is to force Africans to do something to earn Western aid, aid which should focus on helping the Africans address and solve the problems nature presents them so they can build stronger nations in the long-term, that's real help, not just bailing them out when the proverbial hits the fan. Do you like me wonder what will it take to make Africa a peaceful, independent and just society where all Africans can enjoy a dignified life as promised by their blessed Saint Nelson?


Every time somebody dares to question Liberal-Multiculturalists who assert that the races are evil, they are demonised and dehumanised as racists. Yet it is now very clear to me that in fact, the Liberal-Multiculturalists are the true racists. In chasing their rainbow fantasy, they have destroyed South Africa and Zimbabwe with catastrophic consequences that have caused blacks to suffer enormously - famine, violent crime, government abuse and oppression, child abuse and murders of children for muti medicine and rampant HIV. They scream racist at their opponents but they care not a jot for what has happened to millions of African blacks.

Whites too have and are suffering from an escalating and brutal violent crime wave including a genocide of the Boer farmers. And at each turn Liberal-Multiculturalists blame whites for everything and reward other races with scant regard for the consequences. This is because Multiculturalism is anything but, it is about the total destruction of the affluent Western, first-world societies created by whites followed by the annihilation of the white race without any care or responsibility for the ensuing dreadful suffering that will be endured by blacks. All that matters is that whites and their societies are erased from every corner of the world.

There is a trite sound-bite regarding evil that is regularly trotted out in an attempt to explain how evil arises: "All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing."

It may have a grain of truth but that's about it. Because for evil to truly flourish it requires much more. It requires people to willingly place fantasy above reality, to knowingly accept falsities over truth and to place vanity and self-interest above all else along with avoiding any responsibility for the consequences of their actions and to knowingly disconnect from the realities they create.

South Africa and Zimbabwe show us the destiny that awaits Great Britain if we continually allow the evil that destroyed them to continue to thrive in our land.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Ted Nugent on guns and criminals

I loved this video. It's a keeper. The man could be reading my mind. My thoughts exactly and certainly the attitude of most responsible, reasonable people. Enough with the namby pamby leftwing liberal BS.

Hat tip: DR

Hijackers kill stroke survivor

I don't think it is necessary to spell out that the victims were white, and the hijackers black..........!!

A man partially paralysed by a stroke was shot in front of his wife when he could not open the passenger side door of the vehicle three gunmen were hijacking.

Thugs shot Henry Vorster, 57, through the neck and then through his chest moments after shooting his wife Magriet, 58, outside their Willows townhouse complex at about 11pm on Friday.

A stroke about four years ago paralysed Vorster down his left side, making him almost unable to walk and rendering his left arm useless.

'They shot him in the neck'

Police arrested the three suspects in Soshanguve on Saturday while driving the stolen red VW Polo but have yet to link them to the hijacking and murder.

Magriet said the couple left her mother's house in Pretoria North after a braai late on Friday night. "When we arrived at the complex I noticed a car near the gate but couldn't see anyone inside the it," she said from her hospital bed.

"I pressed the button to open the security gate and the next minute there was this guy next to the car. He shouted that it was a hijacking and that we must get out of the car or he would shoot," she said.

Magriet said she immediately tried to get out, but the gunman smashed the window and fired a shot which struck her right hand. "As I got out of the car he shot me again in the leg. I screamed at my husband to get out of the car but he could not open the door anyway because his left side is paralysed.

"The man pulled him over the car's centre console and out of the driver's door. They shot him in the neck, but before throwing him on the ground they shot him through the heart," she said.

Magriet said she would see the men again in court

Magriet, fighting back tears, explained how her husband was struggling to breathe. "I realised he was not getting air and rolled him over. I wanted to get my bag so I could use my phone to call for help, but the men had stolen it too. I started screaming at the top of my lungs," she said.

A neighbour across the road heard the commotion. He spotted the suspects and gave chase while another neighbour called for help.

The neighbour who chased after the suspects soon returned. He loaded the injured couple into his car and rushed them to Wilgers Hospital. "Doctors tried to resuscitate Henry for about an hour and a half, but he died," she said. Soshanguve police arrested the three suspects on Saturday after a shootout.

Police Inspector Mike Mbewe said police spotted the red Polo and gave chase.

He said a shootout ensued during which one of the suspects was wounded. "He is in hospital under police guard.

"The men were arrested and charged with being in possession of a stolen vehicle. They still need to be linked to the hijack and murder," he said.

Magriet said her two children, a son and daughter, were struggling to come to terms with the murder. She said she could not understand why the suspects would shoot her husband who clearly posed no threat. "He could not do anything on his own. He was still adapting to the stroke. I had to bath him and put his clothes on for him," she said.

Magriet said she would see the men again in court. "I will testify in their trial," she said.