Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Zim here we come...?

The African National Congress, under pressure over the amount of land still in white hands, called on Sunday for the scrapping of laws allowing farmers to set a price for land to be redistributed to black South Africans.

"The willing-buyer/willing seller clause has to be abandoned," said a statement after South Africa's governing alliance held a summit to review economic policy driving the country forward after elections in 2009. ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe said the current situation where 87% of the country's land still resided in the hands of 50 000 white farmers, 14 years on from the end of whites-only apartheid rule, was "untenable"."

Land redistribution cannot depend on the willingness of those who own to sell," he said, adding there should be an "evaluation of land and expropriation thereof". Land reform has become an increasingly contentious issue throughout Southern Africa since Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe embarked on a programme that has seen about 4 000 white farmers lose their land since the turn of the decade.

While Mugabe's policy has been blamed for much of Zimbabwe's economic turmoil, many Africans applaud his self-styled drive to correct imbalances stemming from the colonial era. The failure of current land distribution legislation led the ANC to try implement a law this year which would speed up land reform through expropriation.However lawmakers shelved the controversial Bill in August citing "improper consultation" and some parts of it were said to be unconstitutional.

The South African Institute of Race Relations, in calling for the Bill to be withdrawn -- which aimed to allow for expropriation in "the public interest" -- said it was a "draconian measure" which would unsettle the property rights of all South Africans.

Parliament's public works committee said it hoped the legislation would be reintroduced in the next Parliament. While South Africa has promised to redistribute 30% of white-owned land by 2014, the government's flailing land reform programme has so far seen only 4% of land, or four-million hectares, transferred to black South Africans since 1994.

Farmers have often been accused of asking unrealistic prices for their land while they in turn have bemoaned the levels of bureaucracy involved in the whole process. Mantashe bemoaned the fact that land restitution always becomes a "racial issue" where white farmers need to be protected.

The ANC and its junior partners from the South African Communist Party (SACP) and Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) meanwhile said emergency measures were needed to bring relief to those struggling with rising food prices."There must also be a moratorium on the sale of government land for golf courses and game parks rather than agriculture."

The alliance also vowed to halve unemployment by creating five million jobs

"The creation of decent work for all South Africans, including the unemployed and underemployed, must be the primary focus of all economic policies, including industrial and trade policy," read an alliance statement which laid out the commitment to create five million jobs.South Africa's exact unemployment level is a matter of contention, with official estimates putting it at 23,1% of the population while unofficial estimates put it at nearly 40%.

Mantashe said the five million figure would cut the unemployment level by more than a half.
"It will take us below the halfway mark. We aim to halve unemployment by 2014," he said.

4 Opinion(s):

Anonymous said...

The truth is South Africa does need land reform, and there has been little transformation in distribution of land ownership since 1994. Essentially, because of "willing buyer, willing seller" principle, and majority of blacks simply being unable to afford "market prices" that white farmers set for land, the distribution remains as it had after 1913 and 1936 Natives Lands Acts, only without the so-called "homelands." On this issue, I think the PAC and AZAPO make a lot of sense, that distribution, where white farmers still own 80% of land, is just not acceptable in a post-apartheid South Africa.

FishEagle said...

@ G-man. Do you believe your intentions are noble? Do you think you could be open to scrambling around the priorities a bit? Could it be possible that education is the first priority, before land distribution?

FishEagle said...

@ G-man. Do you believe your intentions are noble? Do you think you could be open to scrambling around the priorities a bit? Could it be possible that education is the first priority, before land distribution?

Anonymous said...

Gman you make no sense at all.
You remind me of Garp, except this is the World according to Gman.
What a dumb idiot.
You dumb tit!