Why Julius Malema is spinning the Pan-Africanist line Lyndall Beddy
Saturday, February 06, 2010 [ Reads:392 / Comments:10 / 1328 ]
Julius Malema is not talking the PAC party line spontaneously but on instructions. PAC is seen as one of the threats to the ANC not Cope who shot themselves in the foot by appointing Dandala. When the inevitable happens and the poor get poorer and there are more of them as they still keep having babies that others must feed, educate and clothe; then Malema will emerge as the saviour. There is still no industrial policy in place, after 16 years of ANC rule, so there will be less jobs not more.
Thanks to Trevor Manuel’s biography we know that the ANC has had American (presumably Black) advisors since the 1990s. Last time the ANC had a problem the American’s created a “messiah”, Zuma. The Americans are grooming Malema, as the new “messiah”, and the media will oblige by being led by the nose again. After all, that is what brand labelers do, and why they are so well paid.
The other threat to the ANC kleptocracy is, of course, Prince Buthelezi and the IFP.
It is Buthelezi, not Zuma who is the 100% Zuluboy, and also a Zulu prince and entitled to wear the skins, which Zuma is not. And Buthelezi is also 100% Christian – the normal kind with one wife. He is,in fact, the most important layman in the Anglican Church. In that capacity he should have had the support of his Bishop, Bishop Tutu, who instead found every excuse to insult him because he would not support the “People’s War” of the ANC. Buthelezi is also 100% South African, who, as Minister of Home Affairs, warned that the borders must be controlled or we would import xenophobia. In other words Buthelezi has more than one identity, unlike the Pan Africanists whose only identity is their skin colour – and will therefore happily support Mugabe or Al-Bashir.
It is Buthelezi and the IFP whose policies are the policies of the original ANC of John Dube, Sol Plaatjies, and Chief Luthuli, who were educated, black, Christian, South Africans and whose policies ran along the lines of the old Liberal Party of Alan Paton and my grandfather.
Which is why violence, including the Boipatong Massacre, was fermented in the name of the IFP by the ANC, in an obvious False Flag campaign, in true communist style, the style that the ANC were taught in Vietnam.
And this smear campaign has been so successful that SAFM gave the IFP no cover at all before the last elections, and Buthelezi no interviews until after the election. None that I heard – and I listen every day.
This smear campaign of the IFP by the ANC has also been so successful that the newspapers would allow no printed support for the IFP. I know – I tried. My comments on Thoughtleader were all censored out; and my comments on The Times deleted.
And, in the meanwhile, Zuma won’t pardon the PAC and IFP prisoners lodged in prison in considerable less comfort than Nelson Mandela’s single cell on Robben Island. Are you surprised?
According to “The People’s War” by Anthea Jeffrey the ANC were taught that if they ran a Third Force (like the ANC’s Operation Vula) then always to claim the other side (De Klerk) had the Third Force and were responsible for the violence. Violence escalated after the 1994 elections and was blamed on a De Klerk Third Force, for which there has never been any proof. That violence was very likely to have been the ANC continuing its necklacing of the IFP and PAC opposition.
Which is why the TRC did NOT cover that period, but conveniently ended on election day.
Which is also why those PAC and IFP prisoners that Zuma won’t pardon are in prison.
The ANC – Africa’s oldest Liberation Movement, and newest kleptocracy, asset stripped 300 years of assets built by the whites in 16 years. Ghana was bankrupted in less than a decade by the first Pan-Africanist, Kwame Nkrumah, but then Ghana was not as rich as South Africa, so it has taken the ANC a little longer to bankrupt SA.