Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Is America waking up in time?

Globalism vs. Americanism

by Patrick J. Buchanan


Down at the Chinese outlet store in Albany known as Wal-Mart, Chinese tires have so successfully undercut U.S.-made tires that the Cooper Tire factory in that south Georgia town had to shut down. Twenty-one hundred Georgians lost their jobs.

The tale of Cooper Tire and what it portends is told in last week's Washington Post by Peter Whoriskey. [As Cheaper Chinese Tires Roll In, Obama Faces an Early Trade Test, September 8, 2009] How could tires made on the other side of the world, then shipped to Albany, be sold for less than tires made in Albany?

Here's how.

At Cooper Tire, the wages were $18 to $21 per hour. In China, they are a fraction of that. The Albany factory is subject to U.S. health-and-safety, wage-and-hour and civil rights laws from which Chinese plants are exempt. Environmental standards had to be met at Cooper Tire or the plant would have been closed.

Chinese factories are notorious polluters. China won the competition because the 14th Amendment's "equal protection of the laws" does not apply to the People's Republic. While free trade laws grant China free and equal access to the U.S.
market, China can pay workers wages and force them to work hours that would violate U.S. law, and China can operate plants whose health, safety and environmental standards would have their U.S. competitors shut down as public nuisances.

Beijing also manipulates its currency to keep export prices low and grants a rebate on its value-added tax on exports to the U.S.A., while imposing a value-added tax on goods coming from the U.S.A. Thus did China, from 2004 to 2008, triple her share of the U.S. tire market from 5 percent to 17 percent and take down Cooper Tire of Albany. But not to worry. Cooper Tire has seen the light and is now opening and acquiring plants in China, and sending Albany workers over to train the Chinese who took their jobs.

Welcome to 21st century America, where globalism has replaced patriotism as the civil religion of our corporate elites. As Thomas Jefferson reminded us, "Merchants have no country." What has this meant to the republic that was once the most self-sufficient and independent in all of history?

Since 2001, when George Bush took the oath, the United States has run $3.8 trillion in trade deficits in manufactured goods, more than twice the $1.68 trillion in trade deficits we ran for imported oil and gas. Our trade deficit with China in manufactured goods alone, $1.58 trillion over those eight years, roughly equals the entire U.S. trade deficit for oil and gas.

U.S. politicians never cease to wail of the need for "energy independence." But why is our dependence on the oil of Saudi Arabia, the Gulf, Nigeria, Canada, Mexico and Venezuela a greater concern than our dependence on a non-democratic rival great power for computers and vital components of our weapons systems and high-tech industries?

As Executive Director Auggie Tantillo of the American Manufacturing Trade Action Committee compellingly argues:

"Running a trade deficit for natural resources that the United States lacks is something that cannot be helped, but running a massive deficit in manmade products that America easily could
produce itself is a choice--a poor choice that is bankrupting the country and responsible for the loss of millions of jobs."

How many millions of jobs?

In the George W. Bush years, we lost 5.3 million manufacturing jobs, one-fourth to one-third of all we had in 2001. And our dependence on China is growing.
Where Beijing was responsible for 60 percent of the U.S. trade deficit in manufactured goods in 2008, in the first six months of 2009, China accounted for 79 percent of our trade deficit in manufactured goods.

How can we end this dependency and begin building factories and creating jobs here, rather than deepening our dependency on a China that seeks to take our place in the sun? The same way Alexander Hamilton did, when we Americans produced almost nothing and were even more dependent on Great Britain than we are on China today. Let us do unto our trading partners as they have done unto us.

As they rebate value-added taxes on exports to us, and impose a value-added tax on our exports to them, let us reciprocate. Impose a border tax equal to a VAT on all their goods entering the United States, and use the hundreds of billions to cut corporate taxes on all manufacturing done here in the United States.

Where they have tilted the playing field against us, let us tilt it back again. Transnational companies are as amoral as sharks. What is needed is simply to cut their profits from moving factories and jobs abroad and increase their profits for bringing them back to the U.S.A.

It's not rocket science. Hamilton, James Madison and Abraham Lincoln all did it. Obama's tariffs on Chinese tires are a good start.

Want to comment on Pat's column? Visit our site here:
http://buchanan.org/blog/globalism-vs-americanism-2192

1 Opinion(s):

Viking said...

I'd like to hear what Vanilla Ice thinks of this.
On one level protectionism of jobs is good for a country but on another it isn't. The Chinese have to spend all those dollars on something.
P.J.O'rourke pointed out that Unions were arguing the same thing about Japanese imports in the 1980s, and the Japanese bought property in the USA with all the dollars, and then the boom went bust, and Americans ended up with all the Toyotas and all the money too. A little glib but you get the point.

The big problem with the argument, is that ultimately wages in China will rise and become uncompetitive (this happened in South Korea), but by then the USA will not be able to manufacture stuff, having given away all their industries. This is even more true of farming, but that's a subject for another day.

Also, as Buchanan points out, Chinese factories are not very efficient, and neither are their workers. (still more so than Africans though!). But I don't think they are as Dickensian as he makes out.

The difference in cost between Chinese goods and American ones is actually very slight, and the quality is much lower for the Chinese stuff. People aren't stupid, but the problem is that Walmart doesn't give them a straight choice.

I wanted to buy a Springbok shirt two years ago and looked through all the gear on display and bought the only t-shirt that WASN'T made in China - it was made in SA.

I wore the thing all the time and after two years it's still like new. NOT what I can say for the Chinese crap I've bought over the years. I even have a tshirt made in Lesotho that came from Mr.Price that has lasted THREE years.

When the Chinese eventually up their game, their costs will spiral and they'll lose their edge. People just need to shop wisely.