Wednesday, August 05, 2009

Genetic testing for IQ and personality in China

Our expert in IQ matters Vanilla Ice may feel vindicated(?) by learning that the thankfully un-peecee Chinese have confirmed what he and many others have been stating as fact, that IQ is a real indicator of intelligence and is genetic. As they say, FACTS are stubborn things.

A reader sent me a link to this CNN Article about how China is implementing genetic testing of children:


Scientists claim a simple saliva swab collects as many as 10,000 cells that enable them to isolate eleven different genes.

By taking a closer look at the genetic codes, they say they can extract information about a child's IQ, emotional control, focus, memory, athletic ability and more.


Meanwhile in Western nations, politically-correct liberals deny that mental attributes have anything to do with genes.

The existence of such tests means we will soon have conclusive genetic proof regarding differences between the races with respect to intelligence and personality.

9 Opinion(s):

Treacle Bender said...

The liberal sods will never allow this testing...too racist an all...

Anonymous said...

Oh - not on humans please! But it works on racehorses, special purpose dogs etc...
Eugenics is a bad word since about the early sixties.

Anonymous said...

Only the Chinks and the Russkies would get away with doing this. Any other country in the world would get a kick in the arse from the big boys. Makes you think ...

Vanilla Ice said...

In my lifetime we may yet see the findings of IQ research become mainstream. All other attempts at evening the playing fields have failed, and will continue to do so, until the obvious is accepted.

Anonymous said...

IQ "debate" is for retards like VI and BC.

Anonymous said...

@anonymous 6:40 AM

Go stir shit somewhere else, you dwax.

Doberman said...

@ anon 6:40, dumb nonsensical troll-like comment. VI and BC are opposites on the matter, your point?

Anonymous said...

Anyone ever read any of Daniel Goleman work?

Viking said...

@Anon 4:30
nope. heard of him though, what does he write?