I became an adult well into the apartheid era, towards its demise. This short essay is not about the merits or otherwise of the policy of separate development, that's an argument for another day and many people hold strong views on either side of the debate.
Related:
BEE laws are racist: De Klerk
Affirmative Action and the Demise of the Working Elite
Entrenching Mediocrity
Pledge to End Skills Shortage in Cities
Does Anyone Really Believe In Affirmative Action?
AA, BEE - and the Stalinist implementation
What I want to focus on is the premise given by the international community and anti-apartheid activists for decades that discriminating on the basis of race was bad. Racism = bad. All racism must go. No ifs, ands or buts. "Every human being," they proclaimed loudly, "must be judged on the content of their character and not the colour of their skin".
Since the end of apartheid however, it seems not all racism is considered bad. In fact, certain forms of racism is good, positive for society. Racism that promotes the "previously disadvantaged" on the basis that historically a group had been discriminated against is acceptable. That the policy has an obvious flaw in that it fails to determine whether all members of a group had been equally discriminated against or whether the group previously benefiting had all equally shared in the "spoils" does not factor into the equation to receive preferential treatment (or punishment).
Transformation has come to mean what you did to us, now we're going to do it to you.
During the Nat era, the term used was "separate but equal development". Today, it is "transformation". Society must 'transform' to reflect the demographics. In order to achieve that, we must overlook obviously more qualified candidates simply because they have the wrong skin hue and replace them with people of lesser skills to balance out the numbers. That no one knows how to end it or what to do when the quota has been met is not debated. Indeed, it has been said many times that the process is open-ended until "every black has a job".
Newsflash to the ANC: no workforce on earth mirrors its demographics. If apartheid had never existed, the workforce would still not be represented along racial lines. Indians are a good example. Despite being under the same severe apartheid restrictions as blacks, the Indian population is disproportionately represented in the workforce prospering during apartheid - and since despite enduring another round of discrimination.
At the end of the day we have to ask ourselves something. Will quotas, affirmative action or positive racial discrimination advance or worsen the post-apartheid mentality and race prejudices? The answer is no. It has had a negative effect on relations between the races, engendered enormous resentment, cost the country immeasurable skills and resources, led to a brain drain, a collapse in basic standards in all spheres of society, the opposite effect with regards to racial harmony. Attitudes have hardened.
It leaves me as a white South African wondering whether the black bank teller I'm looking at (say), got his job on merit or because of a quota. Possibly he may have been the best qualified for the job but the mere fact that most blacks are shoe-horned into positions where they do not belong by virtue of their skin hue casts a shadow of doubt over every black. When blacks fail to succeed because they weren’t qualified in the first place, it only reinforces negative prejudices about them.
We need to remove the shadow. We must remove all race-based quotas and considerations if we really want to end racism. Let everyone rise and fall on their own efforts. The time to end affirmative action is now. The country simply cannot sustain it.
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
End Affirmative Action Now
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 Opinion(s):
excellent post!
Thank you. I don't get much time sometimes to collect my thoughts as I am always rushing but I think my main points came out decently this time.
Good post Dobes. Of course I agree, but not only because I'm white; I think BEE and AA is eating away at the psyche of blacks and making them into second class citizens, the exact opposite of what it is intended to remedy. Levelling the playing fields will mean doing away with artificial BEE targets and quotas. Now you know, and I know that this will mean that purely competent people (of whatever race or gender) will very quickly dominate again. That is as it should be for winners to emerge and claim their dominance and respect in society. The ANC knows that too of course. They are in a quandry, a real moral and ethical dilemma. It goes to the heart of self worth and a fundamental sense of being human.
The problem facing any black person gaining a position of any value or consideration is whether AA or BEE had anything to do with it. Truly gaining a sense of achievement is a real problem for blacks. How would a black person "know" the difference? Is it because of my abilities or because I'm black? It's not to say all blacks are appointed purely because of race. Many are competent of course, but so many are appointed because of colour, how would any black person know the difference?
Think about it. It's a terrible dilemma for any sensitive, intelligent black person. What a shame!
Echo your thoughts exactly, Exzanian. It's not just because I'm white that I'm against AA. If the economy suffers, it'll be the poorest who are hit the worst, and that's the black people. Ultimately, it is in their interests most of all to scrap it. They need to take a look over the northern border and figure it out.
Post a Comment