Pretoria - Eskom's application for a 34% price hike is for the benefit of South Africa, the parastatal's chief executive Jacob Maroga said on Monday. "This application should be seen as a country application which requires a country dialogue," Maroga told the National Energy Regulator of SA's (Nersa) public hearings into the tariff hike application. "This is not about a 34% for Eskom it must be driven by the aspirations of South Africa first rather than the interests of Eskom." Eskom"s application has raised the ire of civil society and labour movements, many of whom would present their arguments during the two-day hearings at the CSIR convention centre in Pretoria. Nersa has received 170 submissions on Eskom's application, 25 would be heard during the course of the hearings. Maroga described the economic climate as "extraordinary". "These are extraordinary times and they have an impact on us," he said, referring to the global financial crisis causing countries across the globe to tighten their belts. The global financial system coupled with the country's transition from an era of "abundant and cheap electricity" to "constrained reserve margins and an increase in costs" were highlighted as key contributors to the parastatal's application. Eskom's aim was to contribute to the growth of democracy and the country's economy. "We want to make it our business to contribute to democracy in South Africa to contribute to a thriving economy. "We want not only to have power available but have power available all the time. Power is like oxygen to the economy," Maroga said. The parastatal needs funding for the "biggest capital expansion programme" the country has seen - with R385bn being spent over the next five years. - Sapa
It's all over bar the shouting as far as Eskom's price hike is concerned. Raising capital via foreign investors is not possible because of our lousy bond ratings, and it's not possible via a once-off tax hit because nobody in their right mind believes that such a tax would be a once-off. So it's a case of slowly bleeding the paying consumer to death. Vavi knows by now when to keep his mouth shut, and one wonders to what extent Cosatu is shadow boxing while knowing very well that none of their protests will work anyway.
QUESTION OF THE DAY: WHO SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE?
-
Seems this administration has been very busy releasing information that had
no businesses being released, to put it mildly. The past week has been
filled w...
47 minutes ago
4 Opinion(s):
but this is only for people who actually pay for electricity right?
134% of zero is still zero for those who get it for free..
Estimated spending R 385 billion over 5 years. If we can draw paralells to the arms deal this can easily grow to R 970 billion.
Can you imagine the tender fraud an corruption that such a amount of bucks will pave the way for ?
ESKOM - ALIVE WITH POSSIBILITIES !
Found this....
http://www.freemarketfoundation.com/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleType=regulation&ArticleID=954
How does rewarding electricity non-payment help?
The Soweto Electricity Crisis Committee is helping residents to rip out electricity meters and reconnect to avoid being charged for consumption. By now, there are probably millions of users persistently not paying. So Eskom plans to write off R24bn in arrears, largely Sowetan. Eskom's bosses have also lost R128m in a bungled forex transaction then pocketed R6.56m in bonuses. And now, in its snail-crawl towards privatisation, Eskom wants above-inflation tariff increases which even chronic defaulters are protesting. Why reward non-payment and penalise dependable customers who meet their commitments? Sustainable development would surely require the opposite. (Star 14.3, Cit. 15.3)
and another...
This article argues that the impact of electricity theft and non-payment in South Africa on the
national electricity demand is about 3600 MW, which is equivalent to the output of a major coal-fired
power station, or about 10% of the current national demand of around 36 000 MW.
read article here...
http://www.sarpa.co.za/events/folder.2008-02-28.4259943945/papers2008/2.pdf
@ BE, "10% of the current national demand". That's an incredible figure. I'd love to know the figure in rand terms. The problem of electricity theft has been around for ages but I guess it is much easier to tap the taxpayer than cut off all the millions of illegal connections.
Post a Comment