Thursday, June 04, 2009

10 000 child prostitutes in Johannesburg

For most people, the pro-choice / anti-abortion issue ranks right up there in the heated argument department, where they hold the most firm views; as with gay marriage, the death penalty and race relations. But none I feel are as destructive to human lives and societies as the plight of street children, a problem very close to my heart having found myself on a few occasions on the brink of living on the streets as a youth.

For many the answer is clear cut, black or white, right or wrong, yes or no, no middle ground and maybe it is the same for me. I retain a strong opinion rightly or wrongly, that terminating a foetus that is unwanted is a lesser evil as opposed to allowing yet another unwanted child to be born to parent(s) - and a world - that is overpopulated and simply does not want them. They become what is blithely referred to as "street children".

The United Nations estimates (2008) that there are 100 - 150 million street children
broadly defined as children who are deprived of care and shelter, abandoned like unwanted animal litter left to wander the streets by day begging or selling trinkets and at night congregating in numbers hoping for safety in derelict abandoned buildings, back alleys, parks, garbage dumps, cemeteries and any other public space.

To survive, these kids typically resort to theft and prostitution often being very sexually active. Some say that is because of their longing to feel loved combined with a lack of any guidance or family structure. According to some studies, about 70% of street kids have one or two sexual partners per day and as a result a majority of street children contract STDs and HIV/Aids. For girls, it is especially difficult. An estimated 80% of girls turn to prostitution as a means of survival and contraceptives are rarely used. Pregnancies and self-induced abortions are common. Life on the streets is hell on earth and also fatal for many. If illness isn't the cause of death, most succumb to drug addiction and many are simply murdered. Their lives are worthless.

Armed with this reality, and being an atheist, having to account to no higher authority or imaginary being other than my own common sense and morals, I posit the view that terminating a foetus in a few short minutes is interminably more preferable to letting that foetus be born only to suffer for years and die a lingering agonising death on the streets.

And therein lies my problem with the pro-life movement too. While they mollify their imagined sins by professing to all how 'good' they are by being anti-abortion, peering upwards hoping "the big guy above" is watching their infinite goodness and who will one day hopefully reward them in the afterlife by not sending them to hell, FEW of these 'good' people, I repeat, FEW of these people will put forward a proposal as to how all these tens of millions of abandoned children suffering the most inhumane degrading lives will be taken care of.

Yet there they are, Sunday after Sunday punching away at the bible, 'cleansing' their sins, professing the sanctimony of unborn life but giving not a moment's notice to 150 million abandoned children. I say to all pro-lifers; put your money where your mouths are and adopt one or more of these abandoned children and only when every child on earth knows a loving home and family may you even think about advocating bringing more unwanted children into this world. You simply do not have the right and your 'religion' certainly does NOT give you the right! Stress about the living as much as you care about the unborn.

I will leave you with a poem written by a street child. I don't know what became of her but see the pain in her words. Then look at your children and say, "there but for the grace of God go they".


To love is to live, to live is to be real.
Reality is to be unhappy
and happiness is to want to die.
Death is the end of everything
But life is beautiful
for those who know how to live,
something I know not how to do.
So I suffer and then I’ll die,
forget the world and never again cry.


Margarete, 17 year-old street girl


Related:
U.S. Abortion Provider Shot And Killed At Church
Baby thrown away like garbage
Vince R: "hole in the wall"

There are about 10 000 child prostitutes in Johannesburg alone, a group concerned with child abuse said on Wednesday.

Bloemfontein, meanwhile, is one of the biggest focal points of syndicates as far as trafficking in children for sex and drug trading are concerned.

A founding member of Sapsac, a body investigating child abuse, Retha Meintjes, who is also the deputy director of public prosecution, says even though similar figures are not available for other cities, all the available information indicates that the situation in Cape Town, Durban and Port Elizabeth are “equally grave”.

According to Sapsac, girls in South Africa are sold for between R2 500 and R12 000.

Countrywide networks of syndicates who are involved in child abuse include “prominent and wealthy” people, even some from the medical field.

Children as young as 10 “are recruited and sexually abused by adults who pay the syndicates”.

Children who work in Port Elizabeth as prostitutes and/or drug dealers, earn between R1 500 and R5 000 per day for the coffers of their “handlers”.

Sapsac said the children who disobeyed the syndicates’ instructions were punished with “extreme physical abuse, or by withholding drugs and food from them or even death”.

The group said it will make an urgent plea to the government to enforce effective measures to protect children, especially with a view to the huge international sporting events which will soon take place in South Africa. Source

13 Opinion(s):

FishEagle said...

This poem just breaks my heart.

Doberman said...

@ FE, so right. "So I suffer and then I’ll die, forget the world and never again cry" No child should ever have to feel like that. So sad.

Vanilla Ice said...

I endorse your view Dobes. As you poignantly indicated in an earlier comment, reality is about unwanted children being born to an uncaring, over-populated and abusive world. One of the issues that disturbs me about pro-lifers, is that they inevitably resort to using abortion pictures, to support their argument. If any of you have seen these pictures, they are horrific and will challenge anybody's beliefs. This is a fraud. We are programmed to respond to death and destruction of "something" that has our likeness. We would not feel the same way if it was, say, a rabbitt foetus. So pro-life activists (unless they support life for all living creatures equally, and are thus vegetarians), when they remove religion from the argument, are the hypocrits. Even pro-life for sentient beings only, would be okay, but then we would have to debate what constitutes a sentient being.

Joe King said...

You,ve read the book, now watch the movie. Please note, not for sensitive viewers. There but for the grace of God............

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xISFxedkhl8

Anonymous said...

This entire premise is based on an old discredited argument of pure nonsense because there would STILL be street children even if EVERY SINGLE SO CALLED "UNWANTED" child was "aborted" for the simple reason that street children are RECRUITED & are the result of complex soci-economic problems. Not from a lack of "abortion". How can anyone promote the brutal killing of unborn children in the name of allegedly preventing street children?!!!!! This is an OUTRAGEOUS assertion!!!!! Just look at how the numerous children who SURVIVED abortions have gone on to have productive lives! [ www.abortiontv.com/Glitch/AbortionSurvivors.htm ] Furthermore: many of those who have been aborted but survived are often left with disfigurement & physical handicaps which they will have to struggle with for the rest of their lives! Now if they are going to be street children [ which is a nonsense assertion ] - then at lest afford them the opportunity to have a COMPLETE working body in which to be better able to survive with.

Read the following quite in order to wake the hell up. Quote: [ Look at the picture of Ana Rosa Rodriguez on the left. At first glance, she might look like an average little girl to you. However, if you look closely, you'll notice that this child is missing her right arm. That's because her arm was ripped off in the process of an abortion on New York's Lower East Side in October of 1991. ] From: joseromia.tripod.com/survivors.html .

The shocking assertion that those street children's lives "are worthless" was appalling. I have at least 3 friends who WERE street children until they became adults & started having better luck. I do not believe that they were "worthless" just because they were once forced to survive on the streets & were not living as well as others. No one's life is "worthless" - trying & difficult but certainly not worthless. Not one of the former street child persons I know ever considered that their not having been born would have been a legitimate solution to their plight.

This blog is promoting some odd Leftist & downright bizarre propaganda in the name of sanitizing the brutality of "abortion" which is a fundamental injustice against people! Because no one has the right to transgress against another person no matter how young a person is & no one has the right to kill another person in the spurious assertion that they will be "spared" a tough life because many aborted babies who survived have gone on to have productive lives. There are far more "abortions" being conducted than there are street children therefore the spurious notion that "abortion" is a "solution" to the complex phenomenon of street & homeless children is being skewed all out of proportion.

Doberman said...

Ok buddy boy/girl, in the interests of fairness I let you spew your pro-life vitriol. Let me state that you are wrong and your position is an opinion - and no amount of words penned IN CAPS will change the views of those opposed to you.

Now, having said what you said which I reject completely, I require from you the names of the number of street children that YOU personally have rescued from the streets, and taken into your home, how much YOU have personally donated to street children's charities, overseas and/or local, whatever, indeed state ANYTHING that YOU personally do or have done besides RANT INCOHERENT SHITE on blogs - to alleviate the plight of homeless children.

Oh by the way, according to UNICEF another 110 street children will die today, a total of 40000 each year, many violently or from disease or drug abuse. No matter, another 120 new streets kids will replace them. So step up mudda or shut the fu*k up. You have no right preaching to anyone.

Anonymous said...

Look here pal. I am not "preaching" anything & your specious & spurious argument is totally discredited. More "abortions" does not equal less street children. This is a sophistic & erroneous assertion. I think it is rather telling that the pro-life position is considered "vitriol" when nothing is more vitriolic as the pro-abortion position. The spurious notion that a person's right to life must be abrogated because of your OPINION that they will end up as "street children lining 'worthless' lives" is outrageous in the extreme. The does not exist a right to transgress against another person just because they are not old enough to defend themselves. I am flabbergasted at the level death apologia coming from you folks. Not one of you would ever condone having to be subjected to this brutal practice yet to deign to preach to others that this pro-death argument is a "legitimate" one by trotting out the canard that if they are not "aborted" they will end up as street children in an act of intellectual gymnastics which only serves to rationalize the horrific & brutal killing of children.

Doberman said...

ANSWER MY QUESTION. How many of these unwanted children that you want brought into the world regardless do you currently support - and how many have YOU adopted. Forget the rhetoric, just give me the figures. If you say you have adopted even ONE child or support even ONE child I will listen to you - and then - you need to show me where you persuade those of your ilk to do the same. Imagine, if one hundred million people that are pro-life took in one street child, we would make the problem go away and your argument would win the day.

But because there are 150 million unwanted children, what you spew is empty, meaningless rhetoric. The world is what it is, there are 150 million street children, FACT, maybe aborting some of them may or may not have lessened the number but I need to see this statistic diminish before I will hold the same views as you.

Nobody wants abortion but moreover nobody wants children to live in squalor and die horrible deaths.

Perhaps you need to spend some time in Africa where people have 20-30 kids, where newborns are dumped regularly in landfills or young children are left to wander the streets in squalor. For you to say that there is not even the remotest possibility that there is a connection between unwanted pregnancies and street children shows me who I am dealing with. Open your mind.

Anyhow, the subject is not that much of interest to me because I worry about the living and yes, I DO sponsor a child each month. This is my last comment on the matter.

Anonymous said...

The facts I presented in an effort at showcasing a more balanced view can not be simply dismissed as "empty rhetoric" because all of the justifications & rationalizations for "abortion" itself is pure empty rhetoric & those who have suffered from the sickening industry would certainly not think that it is "empty rhetoric" neither.

The rhetorical device you employ concerning the notion that Pro-Lifers have to adopt every street child in order for their principled position to have "merit" in your pro-abortion eyes is pure demagoguery & posturing & nothing but empty verbiage because you set an impossible standard which could NEVER be met due to the complex issues which create street children. If every single pro life individual "adopted" a street child THERE WOULD STILL BE STREET CHILDREN because children run away / are lured / recruited to the streets all the time & no amount of child adoption will EVER change that! Keeping children off the streets can even be a tremendous challenge particularly when they are part of gangs.

Look at it [ your hypocrisy ] this way: you consider yourself a Capitalist BUT I doubt you feel obligated to adopt those who have been economically marginalized by the big money / high finance Capitalism [ which is not the free market ] system in order to give merit to your deeply held Capitalist convictions.

Furthermore you feel very strongly that White people can run a country better than Black people but I bet you would bristle at being called a racist yet you tar the Pro Life movement with the EXTREMIST brush by showcasing the most radical adherents while ignoring those who take an INTELLECTUAL / peaceful & libertarian approach such as the Libertarians for Life / Feminists for Life etc. If you want to assert that the Pro Life position has no "merit" in a world of street children than one can ALSO posit that the Capitalist [ or communist / fascist / socialist or any other failed economic system for that matter ] position has no "merit in a world of deprivation.

Just get ready for a rough ride & be prepared to defend your beliefs or to open your mind to the reality that you have been lied to because there does not exist a right to kill anyone regardless of stage of development.

Vanilla Ice said...

@Anon 02:48. Why aren't you speaking out about the 25 cows that are about to be slaughtered.

Dobes. Time to send this schmuck packing.

FishEagle said...

@ Dobes “….and yes, I DO sponsor a child each month.”

I have to be honest and say that I think there are other priorities, but you warm a woman’s heart.

Joe King said...

Unfortunatley, the way I see it is that the abortion issue, as well as the death penalty are out of our hands. There is nothing that you or i can do to change that. As far as abortions go, I have scary mixed feelings. As far as the death penalty goes, Line em up. These are issues that can keep one awake at night. As far as the surgeons go, that perform these operations, well, surgeons are one weird bunch of people - neccassary in life, but screwey. As long as you have doctors that are prepared to cut human beings, you will have abortions. The status quo can not be reversed. We are stuck with it , no matter how hard you scream and shout. Sad but true.

Vince R said...

I doubt that Doberman is advocating any reckless, uninformed choice here. Counselling should obviously be part of the process, but why should a drug addicted mother, unemployed, with AIDS be forced to carry to term?