This is how it works. Either you say the "right" thing, give the "right" answer, either you are "politically correct" or you are attacked. In Ms California's case, queen fag Perez Hilton (not its real name) - see pic - thinks it has the right to call the young woman a 'bitch' which is derogatory not only to her but women in general. Whoa there queer man/woman/thing! Now you've stepped over the line. This is where I go from bemused spectator to getting involved.
I happen to love women a fucking lot more than fags so here goes fags; you think acting inappropriately to a young woman will get you liked? You think disrespecting heterosexuals will get you liked? You think you can force us to accept you? You earn respect, you earn acceptance, you DO NOT demand either.
Understand this; it is us that must change whereas you stay as you are. You are asking perfectly normal human beings without the mental condition to change and you must do nothing? How about you accept that for many people your conduct and lifestyles and condition is simply unacceptable and DEAL WITH IT.
Folks, don't stand for it and don't give in. This is how the majority is intimidated into "believing the right thing". Here's my view on the matter. Marriage IS for a man and a woman only. Homosexuality is abnormal. It is a mental condition. Full stop. I won't stop anyone getting 'married' but I won't accept it either. That's MY opinion and I have the right to express it. Like it, don't like it, I don't give a fucking rat's arse.
What a person chooses to do behind closed doors is their business. But I do NOT like it shoved in my face. I don't flaunt my heterosexuality in your gay bars, gay rallies, gay parades so don't effing do it to me. I don't beat up gays, I don't badmouth gays or preach what gays should or shouldn't do so don't you fu*king gays preach to me what I must think or say.
Okay, we're off topic of sorts but goes to a theme we've been highlighting which is how radical fringe groups who demand tolerance and acceptance are themselves the most intolerant. It's bullshit.
Understand this; it is us that must change whereas you stay as you are. You are asking perfectly normal human beings without the mental condition to change and you must do nothing? How about you accept that for many people your conduct and lifestyles and condition is simply unacceptable and DEAL WITH IT.
Folks, don't stand for it and don't give in. This is how the majority is intimidated into "believing the right thing". Here's my view on the matter. Marriage IS for a man and a woman only. Homosexuality is abnormal. It is a mental condition. Full stop. I won't stop anyone getting 'married' but I won't accept it either. That's MY opinion and I have the right to express it. Like it, don't like it, I don't give a fucking rat's arse.
What a person chooses to do behind closed doors is their business. But I do NOT like it shoved in my face. I don't flaunt my heterosexuality in your gay bars, gay rallies, gay parades so don't effing do it to me. I don't beat up gays, I don't badmouth gays or preach what gays should or shouldn't do so don't you fu*king gays preach to me what I must think or say.
Okay, we're off topic of sorts but goes to a theme we've been highlighting which is how radical fringe groups who demand tolerance and acceptance are themselves the most intolerant. It's bullshit.
8 Opinion(s):
I dethinatley dithagree with Pereth. Mithh California entrant is not a bitth. He thould creep back in to the little brown hole he crept out of. Freedom of speetth hath got to be tolerated if you with to practith it. It ith about Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. He is sutth a poeth! Boy is she thexthy!
Ooo..like the lithp..Joe...;)
How pathetic - you must have a small willy?
Anon 8:50 - you got me there, but boy you should see my tongue!
Homosexuality is a disorder and gays are freaks. If everyone suddenly became gay today, the entire human race would be extinct within a generation.
Marriage is strictly for men and women so that they can live together and have children in a sanctioned way with rules of behaviour that gay men are simply not able to adhere to because of typical gay behaviour. Gay men are much, much more promiscuous than straight men or straight women, so they are much more likely to contract venereal diseases and abuse each other in relationships. They represent selfish individualism taken to its most destructive extreme.
Giving gay men the right to marry and be able to adopt hapless children who are in turn indoctrinated into becoming queers is absolutely contrary to nature and public morals.
Apart from a narcissistic insistence on sensual gratification with no strings attached, typical gay behaviour (TGB) is insisting on freedom of speech for themselves but not for heterosexuals. Typical, closed "liberal" behaviour. Or why we don't just come out and say it: evil behaviour.
Say "no" to gay "marriage". Say "no" to homosexual propaganda and attacks on heterosexual morality.
@ Dachshund, exactly. Your comment "Giving gay men the right to marry and be able to adopt hapless children who are in turn indoctrinated into becoming queers is absolutely contrary to nature and public morals." Therein lies the problem no one can see. Children imitate their parents and watching gay behaviour will instil in children the belief that gay behaviour is normal - and then it becomes a chosen lifestyle - which goes contrary to what gays preach these days that it is genetic, involuntary, a born disorder etc. When we have breached that line, then where are the boundaries? Will we one day give paedophiles the same consideration since many experts believe their conduct is involuntary as well? Will we allow people to marry animals? Where do we draw the line and say, homosexuality is an abomination, repulsive and a freak of nature. It is NOT normal, BUT nevertheless you should be tolerated since you say it is something you are born with. However, when you drag innocent children into the equation, then society must say no. Having a child in a gay relationship is to me, tantamount to child abuse. See? I have a position and like Ms California I am NOT afraid to state it.
I totally disagree that gays are freaks.
I have no problem with anyone's sexuality as long as it doesn't interfere with my life.
As far as I see it, from as scientific and rational a standpoint as I can muster, homosexuality is nature's most painless method of birth control, one that doesn't involve tsunamis, famines or horrible diseases.
Having said that, I find some "queer" behaviour highly offensive, and gay pride parades laughable and pointless.
@Doberman: Well, Sigmund Freud did not agree that homosexuality is a deviation. He said that all people are inherently bisexual and that whether you became heterosexual or homosexual was the result of your experiences with your parents and with others.
Freud was himself a person of low moral character. He was adulterous, had homosexual experiences and was a cocaine addict. He had problems in his marriage and with impotence because he could not tolerate anyone disagreeing with his own point of view. So Freud was a fraud albeit a fashionable one.
Later analysts said that heterosexuality was normal, and that homosexuality resulted from pathological family relationships and/or a compensatory way of obtaining sexual satisfaction when normal, heterosexual relationships were seen as too threatening or demanding. Heterosexuality demands more responsibility than homosexuality. Much easier to lead the "gay" life without wife or children to build a life for or with.
There is a definite correlation between the increase in acceptance of homosexuality and social egalitarianism.
The main reason is the shift to mechanical materialism i.e. the pure mammom mentality. Women are then neglected, children are counted a burden, and woman react in rage to compete. The answer women see is to gain equality in material wealth is by denying differences, which then means denying having or caring for children.
Competition of women with men for equality in a mechanical determined materialistic world requires the reduction of children, and conflict and loss in partner relationships. Birth control, abortion and child care are essential to gain equality. Men suffer the loss of respect from their wives and the reduction of sexual love in frequency and loss of intimacy in exchange for raw sensualism. Whether women remain in marriage or get divorced, they often end up carrying the burden of home making and child care anyway. Unsatisfying lovemaking lures men into pornography, immorality and prostitution. Losses to the family are immense and society crumbles.
We whites don't need anyone to destroy us. We're doing it very well ourselves, thanks.
Post a Comment