Today in the United States and most of the White world, as soon as a White child is old enough to understand language, he is told that he should feel guilt for the crimes of his ancestors. Guilt for finding, conquering, enslaving, and killing off non-Whites around the globe... and littering in the process. Guilt, not for his own crimes, but for the crimes of other people of the same race.
This is a subversive thought, for if one does a balance sheet comparing reasons for White guilt and White pride, Whites might discover that they have far more to be proud of than guilty of. They might then decide to resist their dispossession.
Race starts with boy meets girl, followed by baby. Now the crucial step is point out that the reason extended families provide such perfect analogies for races is because they are actually the same thing. A RACE IS SIMPLY AN EXTREMELY EXTENDED FAMILY.
Extended families share a lot of genes (the next time you're looking at a picture of another Kennedy caught in a scandal, notice how much he looks like other Kennedys), their genetic distinctiveness fades back into the average for the general population with which they intermarry as you move outward to more distant relatives or you move forward or backward in time. The partial exceptions are extended families that intermarry heavily. The most famous examples are the crowned heads of Europe, who for the last two centuries or could reasonably be considered to be one clan. Among Europe's extended family of royals, inbreeding has kept traits like hemophilia, weak chins, and jug ears around longer and more abundantly than would be found in a family with a greater aversion against first cousins marrying. Most families down through history have married almost exclusively within some sort of population that's more restricted than the entire human species. Thus, while traits unique to a family fade with time (forward or backward) and outward to more distant relatives, a racial group's biological traits can remain quite stable over fairly long periods. Of course, families differ, and races may be thought of as extended families. Just as I feel more affinity, solidarity, and find it easier to associate with my own culture and people, I have more affinity, solidarity and find it easier to associate with my own family and it's ways.
I feel a sense of pride of belonging to my family, just as I feel a sense of pride belonging to this race, because who I am is a part of what I am. I am the product of my parents and a part of the family. Just as I'm a product of and by birth belong to a race and are likely to inherent all of our strengths and weaknesses, which are genetic. I'm proud of my mother and father more so than I am of a stranger, because I relate to them in various ways, by inherency.
Obviously, there is more to it than esthetics. A nation is not just a cultural continuity, it is a biological continuity. Given determined, world-wide resistance to assimilation, especially when assimilation must cross racial lines, cultural continuity is impossible without biological continuity.
And just as we instinctively put our children before the children of others, we should put our race and nation first. In every other context we do this without the slightest hesitation, because for any group to survive, its members must put its interests first. General Motors cannot survive if its employees think GM’s interests are no more important than those of Ford or Chrysler.
And the fundamental interest of any nation or race is survival as a people.
We have a right—an absolute right—to be us, and only we can be us.
We have a right to be left alone in our homelands, to take part in the unfolding of our national identities free of the unwanted embrace of people unlike ourselves. Every other race and nationality understands this. We are the only dupes who pretend to believe that if our country fills up with the children of others rather than our own children, it will still be our country.
If they say we are hateful because we want to survive... then it becomes obvious of who's the "bad guy"! The only weak, disgraceful, destructive thing there is, is the destruction of the organic society, through mechanical means. And the fact that parts of that society try to put it's pieces back into it's original self, perhaps enhance it, is not evil, it's noble. And the fact that the shatters that still exist, try to put themselves together into the pure glass once again, as it once was created through labour, is something honourable, not something "EVIL". Since it’s not out to benefit. Just survive and be what it always has been, to be what it's supposed to be (predisposed to), is not evil. Merely, natural. Natural by nature.