Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Post-apartheid generation votes for 1st time

From The Guardian (UK)

Strictly speaking apartheid ended in 1994 but yes, there is a strong youth component that has no connection to the 'liberation struggle'. To them the ANC and its history is a relic of the past. Today's youth does not know discrimination. This youth electorate comprises a lot of computer savvy and literate youth who will vote with their minds and not their hearts. It is they that have the most to lose if things go pear-shaped as it did in Zimbabwe. However, I do not think it will be enough this time around to influence the result of a 2/3rds majority but it will certainly have an impact in 2014 - if we get that far.

The South African national election on Wednesday will be the country’s fourth democratic vote, and the first to involve the “post-apartheid generation”, as the youngest South Africans eligible to vote were born after the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990, after 27 years in prison.

More than 23 million people, including 16,000 of the South African diaspora in Britain and elsewhere, have registered to vote in what is being billed as the biggest election in the country’s history. Campaigning has taken place in traditional rallies but also on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.

Jacob Zuma’s African National Congress (ANC) is certain of another victory but is fighting for every vote in a bid to retain its two-thirds majority, giving it the power to amend the constitution.

For the first time, the ANC faces a challenge from with its own ranks, the breakaway party the Congress of the People (Cope). It was formed in response to “threats to constitutional order emerging from the ANC” and includes some anti-apartheid heroes.

But it is the Democratic Alliance that has the best chance of preventing an ANC clean sweep of all nine provinces. Led by Helen Zille, the popular mayor of Cape Town, the DA is tipped to snatch the Western Cape.

The country has a national assembly of 400 seats and national council of provinces with 90 seats. Election to the national assembly is based on proportional representation, with half of the seats filled from regional party lists and the other half from national party lists. The party with the most seats installs its leader as president.

Crime, jobs, poverty, service delivery and political corruption are the dominant issues. Fifty murders a day take place in South Africa, with rape and robbery also shockingly high. One in five of the workforce is unemployed, according to some estimates, a toll that rises much higher in the poor interior.

There is a small and expanding black middle class but a widening gap between rich and poor. Corruption is reported at all levels of government. Aids takes 1,000 lives a day.

Critics of the ANC argue that, like many liberation movements, it has struggled to make the transition to governing a multi-party democracy. Some are disenchanted by promises not delivered, while millions of young voters have no memory of the struggle against apartheid. But the ANC still enjoys a halo effect from that era.

A poll by Ipsos Markinor suggests it will win a 65% majority. Race is still a factor: 79% of black voters will back the ANC, while the majority of the DA’s supporters are white.

3 Opinion(s):

Ron. said...

This report of course is an example of lazy journalism because Apartheid ended on June 17 1991 when the Parliament abolished the final 3 major Apartheid laws. This is also an example of a lack of critical thinking because the Apartheid laws would have HAD to go BEFORE the multi racial election could occur. Ergo: the multi racial election is often erroneously asserted as "the end of Apartheid" BUT it could NEVER have occurred without the abolishing OF Apartheid. Cognitive dissonance anyone? The post 1991 De Klerk government was certainly a holdover from the Apartheid era BUT from June 1991 to May 1994 it governed in a POST Apartheid era. Furthermore: it is a stretch to claim that any of the post-Apartheid elections are "democratic" due to the anti-democratic & corrupt nature of the process which marginalizes people about the same as they were within the Apartheid dispensation.

Doberman said...

Good point Ron. I took the argument that really, laws aside, only when a man has actually voted in an election who had previously been denied the right, has apartheid really ended. Until then, it is just laws on paper so in effect 27 April 1994 was the day every South African was afforded universal suffrage - in practice. But you are right. This is the state of modern journalism these days. Woeful to say the least.

Anonymous said...

I agree that it ended in 1994. Technically no but that is when the shit hit the fan and we all started the road of becoming expats.