Head Liberal Hypocrite Al Gore ignores ‘Earth Hour’
Yes, I saw all the suggestions from the media and all the invitations from my many Facebook friends: Go dark for “Earth Hour,” which took place from 8:30 - 9:30 Saturday night.
Yet, here was “Earth Hour” in my household: The kids were in bed, their nightlights illuminated, CD players playing a light classical mix I burned from iTunes, and humidifiers blaring. My wife was catching up on some ice skating on TV, with all the bedroom lights on. And I was recording music in my basement home studio. Now, I’ll bet that equipment uses a lot of electricity. So, for those of you who sat in the dark for an hour on Saturday so that I could crank the Marshall amp up to “11” uninhibited, thank you!
Now, for you diehard environmentalists, don’t expend all of your righteous indignation just on me. You’ll need to reserve a little bit of it for your hero, Albert Gore, Jr. Turns out the “P.R. person for the planet” didn’t participate in Earth Hour either:
March 29, 2009
Al Gore ignores ‘Earth Hour’
Driveway to Nashville mansion flooded with electricity
Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” may have inspired many to participate in yesterday’s “Earth Hour” by switching off their lights from 8:30 p.m. to 9 p.m., but maybe the former vice president didn’t get the memo.
Drew Johnson, the president of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, decided to drive by Gore’s mansion in Nashville at 8:48 p.m. and records that floodlights were on illuminating the driveway leading up to the main quarter.
“I pulled up to Al’s house, located in the posh Belle Meade section of Nashville, at 8:48 p.m. – right in the middle of Earth Hour,” he wrote on his blog. “I found that the main spotlights that usually illuminate his 9,000 square foot mansion were dark, but several of the lights inside the house were on.”
He added: “The kicker, though, were the dozen or so floodlights grandly highlighting several trees and illuminating the driveway entrance of Gore’s mansion. I [kid] you not, my friends, the savior of the environment couldn’t be bothered to turn off the gaudy lights that show off his goofy trees.”
Earth Hour was deemed a huge success by its organizers, the World Wildlife Fund. The group estimated that 1 billion worldwide took part.
From an Antarctic research base and the Great Pyramids of Egypt, from the Colosseum in Rome to the Empire State building in New York, illuminated patches of the globe went dark last night to highlight what the group believes is a man-made threat of climate change. Time zone by time zone, nearly 4,000 cities and towns in 88 countries dimmed nonessential lights from 8:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., according to organizers.
WWF called the event, which began in Australia in 2007 and grew last year to 400 cities worldwide, “the world’s first-ever global vote about the future of our planet.”
The United Nations’ top climate official, Yvo de Boer, called the event a clear sign that the world wants negotiators seeking a climate change agreement to set an ambitious course to fight global warming.
The event was initiated with hopes of impacting talks in Bonn this week to craft a deal to control emissions of the heat-trapping gases supposedly responsible for “global warming.” The talks are due to culminate in Copenhagen this December.
“Earth Hour was probably the largest public demonstration on climate change ever,” de Boer told delegates from 175 nations. “Its aim was to tell every government representative to seal a deal in Copenhagen. The world’s concerned citizens have given the negotiations an additional and very clear mandate.”
Contributor “Kleinheider” at the Nashville Post’s politics blog reports this morning that the Gores, apparently not appreciating the negative light … um, shone upon them, released this statement to the Nashville Post:
The Gores honored Earth Hour by shutting off the lights at their residence. The heating and air conditioning were turned off as well [Well, why would they both be on to begin with?]. But more importantly, the Gores live in a Gold LEED certified home, powered by geothermal power. They have undergone renovations to put solar panels on the roof and participate in all of the renewable power programs offered by their local utility. They aren’t perfect, no family is, but they do their best, year-round to try to make a difference at home and across the country to make a difference on the climate crisis.
Yeah, I know what you mean. Using 20 times more energy than the average American household is really trying. (If they weren’t trying, it would have been more like 50 times, right?)Gimme a break!
Asked if this meant that the Gore’s were asserting that Drew Johnson was mistaken about seeing lights on at the residence, Kreider responded, “Correct.”
Yet, Johnson stands by his story of seeing bluish moniter/TV lights from inside the Gore mansion, and even provides time-stamped photos of his illuminated driveway.
By the way, Kleinheider reminds us that Johnson is the same guy who exposed Gore’s excessive energy use at his home back in 2007. The following comes from a posting from Johnson’s Facebook page [reprinted in full at Yid With Lid] (Course language warning):
If you’re unfamiliar, Earth Hour is where socialists and patchouli-dabbing tree-hugging hippies unite to dismiss electricity, fossil fuels and the modern conveniences that allow for historically unrivaled prosperity, longevity, health and quality of life throughout the world.
Thankfully, most of the Kool-Aid drinking ballsacks that participated in Earth Hour undoubtedly spent the hour on their couch or on their porch reflecting how solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, short and generally shitty life would be without electricity.
Better get yourself another name and address pronto, Mr. Johnson. Hell hath no fury like a megalomaniacal leftist whose hypocrisy has been publicly exposed.
13 Opinion(s):
I don’t have a problem when people expose hypocrisy. For that matter, fuck Al Gore. But Johnson sounds like a short-sighted, ego-inflated prick that is mistaking the trees for the forest.
How many solutions did Johnson find to the environmental crisis during earth hour? Has Johnson spoken with any hunters, fisherman, subsistence fisherman and farmers, or commercial farmers? Find me just one person that makes a living off the land that denies the crisis in our environment. It sure would make me sleep better at night.
I’d rather have my children live shorter lives than no life at. Johnson has not grasped the choice yet.
Anyone noticed how "Global Warming" suddenly got replaced with "Climate Change"?
In Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth he was hammering on how the earth is warming, and the reverse happened in the last 5 years.
So can you really believe statistics based on the climate of the last 50 years to predict the future weather? No, as Al Gore went to prove.
@Anonynous 01:31. Global warming and climate change are very different things. Global warming refers to the average rise in the earth’s temperature, i.e. it is taking place on a global scale. The consequences of the continued increase in the average temperature will have a major impact on the ocean currents. The changing currents will have different impacts on the respective land masses. If you watched An Inconvenient Truth you would have noticed that Europe will probably become frozen up, as Greenland as today, which is clearly not a “warming” effect but “climate change.”
Al Gore has done wonders to get the message about global warming AND climate change to the general public. It’s more than the scientists can say.
I wonder how much money is behind all this climate changes stuff. To me, it seems like just another money-making scheme on huge scale.
Another thing that really bugs me are these long-life bulbs. Yes, yes, it saves power and lasts months and months. Ok sure, well done. BUT the stuff is full of MERCURY! Does anybody know just how poisonous this heavy metal is?
If these bulbs end up in trash, they will get broken and the mercury dust is everywhere.
When mercury gets inside your body, good luck with getting it out!
Ok, maybe I went a bit off topic but people are so eager to find solutions to one problem that they create another bigger problem with their supposed solution.
Oh for the love of money!
Liezl, there is only 1 solution to all our environmental problems, including climate change, which is to reduce the human population. When you figured out how to make money out of that you can let us know. These practical attempts to reduce our impact on the environment are necessary but they only serve as a treatment of the symptoms and not the cause of the problem.
Strong leadership is needed before the world’s nations will agree to curb their population numbers. A meritocracy may create such leaders. In the meantime I’m considering leaving my job as an environmental scientist and becoming an advocate of the meritocracy. Lol.
You have it so right Liezel, it's all about money. A lot of "scientists" jumped on the bandwagon because they saw it as a money making machine. Just mentioning "Climate Change" somewhere and you are guaranteed to receive research money for your pet project.
The politicians holding the money bag is pretty gullable, and open to any suggestions, remember these people don't have any other motive than to "buy" votes. They will say and do anything to catch the eye of the public.
The ironic fact is that the real scientists out there are lost voices in the dark, swamped in sea of sheep following the leaders blindingly.
The real issue behind this whole "Climate Change" is that the lost liberal hippy generation finally found something new to latch on to, and as we all know, these lot are remarkable for stirring up a big noise for such a small population percentage.
The unfortunate fact is that they are suckering normal people into the hype with scary stories based on very little real facts. Like so many other examples in the past it is very easy to skew the facts and conveniently forget to mention the real facts which point to the contrary.
People need to use critical and analytical thinking when presented with these so-called "facts", unfortunately many people are quite happy to accept fiction as fact without questioning it.
I watched "The Inconvenient Truth", Al Gore would make an excellent Charismatic Church preacher, he has all the qualities of whipping the people up to a frenzy. Unfortunately people like him just have that "hero effect" which sucks people into the hype. Do you yourself a favour and try and watch it as if you are a judge, try and avoid the charismatic trance and concentrate on the facts he presents, then you will notice how thin the facts presented really are.
Anonymous 05:03. Al Gore IS A POLITICIAN. He’s not a scientist!!!! It is his JOB to get the message to as many people as possible. From personal experience, it always requires simplifying things so that IDIOTS like you can understand! I’m waiting with baited breath for you to provide us with the “real” facts from the “real” scientists!
Mark my words, you WILL REGRET your denials.
Ever notice how frustrating it is when people deny how stupid the blacks are when you KNOW that it is the case because you experience the consequences every day of your life? Well I have the same frustration in my job because I work in the environment. And by the way, I don’t work on any climate change projects and I don’t get any funds for making these statements.
Anonymous 05:03 Why don’t you take up a hobby like fishing and find out for yourself how the environment is not what it used to be (just remember to practice catch and release responsibly.)
I’m sure the fish stocks will also become a casualty of global warming because just like everything in the environment, it is connected. People have placed too much pressure on the environmental network. The network is like a web and the pressure on the web is becoming greater and greater as people multiply further. It is only the inertia of the threads that are still holding the web together under the pressure. When one of the threads snap, which may be the analogy for global warming, the entire web is going to come tumbling down. After global warming there will be climate change, biodiversity loss, reduction of agricultural productivity, reduction of aquaculture productivity, destruction of human habitats, etc. etc. I hope you haven’t watched the “Mad Max beyond Thunderdome” movie because it’s not going to be anything nearly as pretty as that.
You tell me whether it is better to do something now to release the pressure or to wait until the web snaps?
The answer is simple: get rid of the democracy, replace it with a political system like a meritocracy that will create a social hierarchy and use the subsequent stronger leadership to reduce the number of people with strict population control restraints. Possibly limit the number of children, for two people, to no more than two. Then we will still need to use all the environmentally friendly technology that we’ve developed over the past years to further reduce our impact.
@Liezel
You are spot on in saying that the solutions usually create a lot of new problems – scientists know how to keep themselves in work!
I’ve also read that hybrid cars use a lot of heavy metals, or am I wrong about that? Now, my car is 35 years old, and I’ve gotten a lot of stick from the hippie types that live in Cape Town. I usually point out that re-using old things is called “recycling”! And that the meagre increase in pollution caused is nothing compared to the environmental damage involved in manufacturing new cars.
Having said that, I am looking into biodiesel as an alternative to gasoline. The benefits are obvious, and ironically, it is older diesels that are more conducive to biofuel than newer ones. Some environmentalists have pointed out that growing the crops that produce the fuel oil will create new problems etc etc etc, but I believe that there is enough farmland to do so, and poor farmers throughout the world will benefit as a result of this cash-crop.
At the following link you can find the criticism of Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth: http://cei.org/pdf/5820.pdf.
I still think both the proponents and antagonists of this debate around AIT are missing the point to some extent because they are still getting caught up in the symptoms of the bigger problem, which is over population. Change the voting system from a popularity based system to a merit based system and people may become less concerned about saving people’s lives and more concerned about saving species, including the human race.
Fisheagle, is this list sufficient for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming
http://www.newscientist.com/blog/environment/2007/10/al-gores-inconvenient-truth.html
http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/official-british-court-finds-11-inaccuracies-in-al-gores-an-inconvenient-truth-labels-it-as-political-propaganda/
BTW, please read my post again, NOWHERE did I mention Al Gore is a scientist. I know he is a politician, and typical like his type he is speaking though his neck to get attention. What I said that scientists cottoned on to the "Climate Change" hype, and by including that in their funding requests they are almost guaranteed to get the funding.
Unlike IDIOTS like you I don't eat up BS fed to me on face value, I look at the real facts, and on facts alone I base my opinion.
Do yourself a favour and get hold of the video "The Great Global Warming Swindle", that exposes the myths and hype of Al Gore on a step-by-step basis, it features well-known scientists in a variety of fields who know their stuff.
Fishing where I life is good, the difference is that we did not over-fish the oceans here. Do some research on Nova Scotia and you will see that their cod disappeared long before the so-called global warming. They simply exhausted the fish stock by overfishing.
Anonymous 05:03. The fact that you’ve done some research on the topic means that Al Gore has already achieved his aim, which is to create awareness amongst the general public. I’m going to leave it to the scientists to take the issue further and to prove or disprove the issue of global warming and climate change. The whole point is that people need to take preventative steps and not mitigative steps. You don’t want to take action after the shit has hit the fan, like the example you mentioned of the disappearing cod around Nova Scotia.
I am well aware of the modern fish management conservation practices that are very advanced in your part of the world. Enjoy it!
@FishEagle
"Liezl, there is only 1 solution to all our environmental problems, including climate change, which is to reduce the human population. When you figured out how to make money out of that you can let us know. "
I agree with you on this. HIV Aids is not working very fast...yet... That sounds vicious but to me this whole Aids epidemic is like a call from old mother nature to reduce all the numbers of people in the world - specially the ones who multiply like there is no tomorrow!
We will all have a better chance at life quality if there are less of us on earth. The more people are concentrated in one place - the more conflict and trouble you get.
To make money out of it...hmmm. China is about the only country in the world who has a system where you pay tax on your second child and onwards...or something like that. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Post a Comment