Wednesday, March 18, 2009

There is no housing crisis in South Africa

By Michael Francis

I was watching the debates on the upcoming election in the Western Cape recently. A large piece of the debate referred to what was deemed a “housing crisis”. I hear similar things being said around Durban and indeed all over South Africa.

I make the claim there is no housing crisis in South Africa. The focus on finding suitable housing for shack dwellers and the homeless only creates ghettoes and entrenches social problems for the poor.

The crisis is not in the lack of urban housing but a lack of real, substantive rural development. The crisis is a lack of jobs and support for rural spaces. If South Africa focused its energy on rural spaces the poor and desperate would not flock to the slums seeking a better life.

How much better would it be for the poor of South Africa to be able to stay at home in their communities surrounded by friends, family and a larger community with who they share a history?

It is not a big logical leap to make the claim that people do not wish to live in the slums. Yet the assumption being made appears to be that people wish to live in small concrete cubes surrounded by thousands of other soulless concrete bunkers. The other development is the continued use of large hostels to house workers far from home.

I for one cannot believe that it is cost-effective to maintain the soulless hostels in Durban’s south industrial basin. These horrific spaces have social spin-offs in the form of the bawdy and rough shebeens, deeply unhappy people crammed together in terrible living conditions and a need to ever extend municipal services.

Mooi River textiles closed down in 1999 leaving thousands of people out of work as they could not compete with Chinese imports. If industry was offered incentives to work in rural spaces then perhaps urbanisation would not be happening at the rate it is. How many factories and businesses could be run just as easily but with a happier, healthier workforce from rural spaces.

Mass urbanisation is not an inevitable effect of modernity and industrialisation. It is the outcome of narrowly focused technocratic solutions to a problem clearly not being understood. Too many town planners trained specifically in urban solutions seem to be involved in what is essentially a rural problem. The politicians themselves often hail from urban spaces and fail to make the necessary connections.

KwaZulu-Natal still has more than 55% of its population living in rural spaces. It clearly needs to focus on rural planning and I have only heard one party discuss rural issues in any meaningful way. The Inkatha Freedom Party actually makes a lot of sense on these issues.

I for one think that we should support the majority of our province in creating a meaningful life in their communities and not aiding the destruction of their communities and the building of slums to house them.

5 Opinion(s):

WHITEADDER said...

Uncontrolled breeding and non existant border controlls are to a large part responsible for this mess. So why should productive people with a family of say 2 kids contribute more and more of their money to this perpetual , pre- programmed black loosers? Any sane white family with small kids needs to get out of the RSA - as the odds are totally against their off spring. With every year this odds are getting worse thanx to the corrupt and criminal ANC gang. The South African problem cannot be solved anymore in a manner that is
acceptable to decent people. We will be at the level of Zim within latest 12 years - just a lot more violent.

Anonymous said...

Interesting post by Michael Francis. The question is: how? The main focus would be on agriculture. However the roads are collapsing (as are hospitals and schools - most blacks in KwaZulu-Natal are worse off now than they were in 1994)and the heavy road tolls make transportation of people and goods economically unviable. Transnet's rationalisations haven't helped either. The Minister of Agriculture Ms Lulama Xingwana pointed out a couple of years ago that farm workers were subject to abuse. This would not be altogether surprising, as farm workers are poorly paid and have far too many children which of course makes them targets for exploitation. The best route would lie in automation. Which would mean the masses moving to the urban areas anyhow. I don't see any other option.

Viking said...

You can't have increased urbanisation when farmland is becoming less productive. Talk about burning the candle at both ends.

Anonymous said...

@Viking: the idea is to make farmland more productive through increased automation. Whether this will work is another question altogether.

What it comes down to is that increasing urbanisation will cause higher crime levels in those areas. Yes, the candle is burning at both ends.

Viking said...

I wish it were true. But the current land redistribution is leading to decreasing efficiency, as the new fammas are selling off all the equipment!
And the poor wonder why food is costing more and more?