Saturday, January 31, 2009

Why African leaders can’t solve the Zim crisis

Robert Mugabe has no intention of relinquishing power. He’s even said as much. And this is merely confirmed by the ongoing abduction, incarceration and torture of opposition activists and a bloody-minded refusal to share key ministries in the proposed unity government.

Read also:
Unemployment in Zimbabwe hits 94 percent - UN

The SADC (Southern African Development Community) is only too aware of the Zanu- PF agenda — and this makes its efforts to force the opposition MDC (Movement for Democratic Change) into a government in which it will be no more than a junior partner all the more chilling.

The SADC is using the unity government as a legitimising mechanism to keep Zanu-PF in power. It knows that it needs the MDC to provide Zanu- PF with a veneer of democratic respectability. But this is not what Zimbabwe’s long-suffering people chose at the ballot almost a year ago.

Yet again the SADC has refused to acknowledge the manifestation of the Zimbabwean people’s democratic will – but this is hardly surprising when SADC observer missions sunnily declared successive Zimbabwean elections “free and fair” — despite overwhelming displays of Zanu-PF-sponsored intimidation and rigging.

Indeed, the SADC’s track record has shown that African leaders are incapable of resolving the Zimbabwe crisis. Not because they aren’t able to, but because they do not want to. Why? Simply because our region’s leaders are not democrats.

Most share the belief that liberation movements have a divine right to rule, plunder and pillage their respective fiefdoms.

Lip service is paid to democracy and transparency provided such concepts do not challenge post-colonial ruling elites.

When Zimbabwe’s groundswell of democratic opposition to Zanu-PF was met with brutal repression, Southern African leaders (with one or two pitiful exceptions) either spoke in support of Mugabe or remained shamefully silent. As Zimbabwe descended into a maelstrom of economic devastation and oppression, both quiet diplomacy and Mbeki’s mediation proved spectacularly successful in propping up Mugabe’s contemptible regime. South Africa has even adopted a proactive approach, working tirelessly to prevent the Zimbabwean tragedy from being discussed in the UN Security Council.

Tsvangarai and his party should treat the SADC — and its brazenly partisan mediation efforts — with the contempt it deserves.

As I have suggested before, an interim government must be installed by the United Nations. This government, staffed by non-political technocrats, can handle humanitarian operations to ensure the roll-out food supplies and healthcare countrywide as well as the operation of essential services, many of which are at a standstill.

The UN must demobilise the security and army, and provide a “peacekeeper” contingent of soldiers and police to ensure safety and security.

And then, some time next year, proper elections must be held — free and fair elections implemented and monitored by the international community.

Zimbabwe deserves nothing less.

2 Opinion(s):

Anonymous said...

Kenya's prime minister Odinga made it clear he wanted Mugabe out yesterday. He got his head bitten off by another SADC leader because of the recent civil war in Kenya.

These SADC leaders sit around glaring at each other and can't seem to agree on anything.

WHITEADDER said...

Zimbabwe deserves nothing less???
I would have thought the Zim majority got what they have ask for.