I'll tell you an interesting tale. A few years ago I leased a business property to a tenant who was involved in recruiting (mainly) black candidates for the police and defence force. She would evaluate them and based on her company's assessment either put them forward to the police training college/army etc.
Anyhow, on one occasion she attended a cocktail function where the then Minister of Defence, Terror Lekota was in attendance. She got talking to him and she said she found him very bright and amiable. She said what he said next shocked her and although not surprising, hearing it from an ANC government minster left her gobsmacked. He said, it was whites that kept the country functioning and that South Africa could not do without whites no matter what his colleagues felt and that he wished whites would remain as they were the backbone of the economy and the country.
It is no surprise then when I read this article in which he specifically mentions retaining whites means he understands that the skills being lost are a disaster to the country.
---
The leader of a breakaway party explains his bid to halt tribalism and white flight.
The former defence minister who is set to smash the mould of South African politics by breaking away from the African National Congress (ANC) and founding a new party will welcome whites, Indians and other minorities into its leadership.
In an interview with The Sunday Times, Mosiuoa “Terror” Lekota, 60, vowed to make a clean break with the past through a party that will be pro-business, free from the rhetoric of Marxism and determined to end the “white flight” that drains talent from South Africa.
The country is estimated to have lost more than 800,000 whites since 1995, many of them disillusioned by violent crime and a government that discriminates against them.Would he put a stop to white flight?
“Absolutely,” Lekota promised. “We must. It’s not just that we want their skills. It’s important that all South Africans feel wanted here. It’s their home, too.
“It’s vital that whites, coloureds [those of mixed race] and Indians all feel that they can participate effectively and be elected to leadership positions.”
In his first major newspaper interview since he resigned from the cabinet last month, Lekota said he was determined to defeat Jacob Zuma, the ANC president, who until last week seemed a shoo-in as the country’s next leader after elections due in the spring.
“I don’t want to attack the man personally,” Lekota said. “Let’s just say I worked with him for a long time and I know that he’s absolutely not an appropriate person to be president of South Africa.”
Lekota, who acquired the nickname “Terror” from his days as a tearaway striker on the football pitch, revealed that his new party will be called the South African National Congress, that it will hold a national convention in the next few weeks and that he is prepared to form a coalition with the liberal and largely white opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, to form a government.
“It would be unavoidable. We just can’t give this country to Zuma and his friends,” Lekota said. He added that he would lead a crackdown on crime and corruption, which are often cited by the 41% of whites who say they are thinking of leaving.
The present ANC leadership harks back to an era when Africans were oppressed, Lekota argued. “But we’re not oppressed now. We’re all equal. South Africa belongs to all who live here.”
We spoke at his government house in Pretoria as he prepared to move out, surrounded by packing cases and giant stuffed animal heads hanging from every wall. Lekota, an incongruous figure in football shorts and vest (he had been doing his morning exercises) said support for his new party was pouring in.
“People are flooding to us everywhere. Huge numbers of ANC branches are coming over to us. Okay, Zuma will probably win KwaZulu-Natal [his home state]. Right now he could probably win a few other provinces, too, but even there the situation is changing rapidly.”
Despite his own impeccably radical past – he spent nearly 14 years in prison under apartheid rule – Lekota recognises a new postracial South Africa that is affronted by Zuma’s naked tribalism and the assumption by his supporters that it is their turn to rule South Africa after three leaders who hailed from the rival Xhosa grouping.
There are reports that the Zulu chiefs have warned that, if they are cheated out of having a Zulu president, they will “send in the buses”, which means buses full of men with spears, intent on wreaking havoc.
Lekota’s lip curls. “Is that democracy? Are people going to be killed if they don’t vote for Zuma? And where does this idea come from that Zuma is born to be president simply because he’s a Zulu? The ANC never elected people on such a basis before.”
Lekota couples this with a recognition that the newly emergent black middle class finds Zuma’s antics off-putting. “There’s a large black middle class now and if Zuma thinks he can win such people over by singing and dancing on street corners, he’s making a big mistake.”
Lekota said that he had confronted Zuma over his tribalism. “I asked him, how can you allow your followers to wear T-shirts saying ‘100% Zulu-boy’? He said it was nothing to do with him, that he hadn’t ordered it. But he allowed it.
“Then they changed it to “100% JZ”, but that’s pure personality cult. The ANC is supposed to be a party of principles. You owe your loyalty to the party, not to an individual.”
Hugely popular among the ANC’s grassroots, Lekota is confident that there will be large-scale defections to his party in the coming weeks. He is also contemptuous of the empty socialist rhetoric spouted by senior ANC figures allied to Zuma, such as Blade Nzi-mande, the Communist leader, who says: “We must build socialism and build it now.”
Lekota said: “I asked him, how would you do that in practice? There is no answer. It’s quite impossible. The countries that were communist have all changed and now we know both that corruption and inequality were always there and that the majority of the population wanted to overthrow those systems. So why should we try to copy that? The fact is we live in a free market economy and have to do our best to help our people within that framework.”
Lekota’s antipathy to Zuma may spring from their sharply opposed personalities. Lekota is devoid of arrogance or pomposity. A Catholic, he is happily married to Cynthia and has four children, in contrast to the scandal-prone Zuma, who has been married four times and is said to have fathered at least 18.
As a student protester, Lekota was expelled from university, arrested and jailed. His time on Robben Island, he said, “was when I really grew up”. It was his long discussions with the ANC leaders Nelson Mandela and the late Walter Sisulu that “really helped me to mature”.
It also bred racial tolerance. “I’d never really been comfortable with a stress on race. Growing up as a Catholic I’d worked too closely with so many white priests and nuns to be anti-white. The ANC’s non-racial philosophy made immediate sense to me.”
When prime minister of his native Free State, Lekota won the hearts of Afrikaner farmers. While still a cabinet minister he spoke about “the wonderful contribution white liberals have made to this country”.
He added: “We really need people like you, so please stay. Please don’t go. The liberal contribution to South African life is far from over.”
Now he is poised to blow apart the ANC, and with it South Africa’s tired political certainties.
Lekota rift
— Elected chairman of the ANC in 1997, Mosiuoa Lekota became defence minister in 1999
— He resigned last month after President Thabo Mbeki was ousted by Jacob Zuma’s supporters
— Expelled from the ANC last week, he is launching a new party
IF TRUE…BOEHNER NEEDS TO GO!
-
Dudes and Dudettes…if this report is true, Speaker of the House John
Boehner needs to go ASAP! Not that he doesn’t need to go anyway via my
viewfinder in l...
2 hours ago
5 Opinion(s):
Some of the commentators on SAS say that if this happens and Lekota forms a new party there will be violent conflict between the Lekota vs Zuma camps. In your honest opinion, do you think that will happen?
I don't think there will be violence. This isn't strictly a Zulu vs Xhosa thing - that's why. Lekota isn't either of these tribes. In my honest opinion, I think a strong opposition to the ANC is very healthy for SA. Remember the elephant in the room, the IFP. They are still very powerful and were they involved, then maybe. NO, I don't believe there will be violence.
I agree that a new party is a good thing and this Lekota guy does not sound too bad but,I tend to differ from doberman on the point of violence.
African leaders become obsessed with power and in most cases they will not give up without a fight.
If Zuma get real opposition his supporters will get violent and he will do nothing to stop it.
I predict a big fight like recently in Kenia.
Hi anon 9:15..
I'll tell you the difference between the SA situation and the Zim/Kenya debacle. The party in power, the ANC, will retain power, albeit with a much lower majority. The new party will make a difference only insofar as it will take away ANC votes. It won't take away votes from the other parties.
Also, unlike Zim/Kenya, the ANC is not all consuming. It does not enjoy total support (well, not anymore). There isn't a large mass of people against another large mass of people i.e two tribes as per Kenya. We have the IFP funnily enough which is the big factor in the SA situation. If the ANC sides tear into each other, the IFP and the whites, indians, coloureds are still there and form a sizeable block. They are at peace. They are not party to the 'fight' in the ANC. This is not their problem and they won't get involved EXCEPT to stop it. That's why there will be no violence.
This is about a party tearing itself into two, not a fight between two tribes. Remember, the IFP is an offshoot of the ANC and it exists quite comfortably on its own. What is happening now is not new.
The ANC is a behemoth with too many chiefs and not enough indians. It is great for the country that it splitting. Finally we can get a true democracy. The people are fed up with misrule and violence.
I was just wondering weather they would use the obvious name SANC, either South African National Congress, or Council if the other name would be banned due to copyright laws.
Or if they would use the old UDF name, which even though only a front for ANC at the time a much more acceptable name and more likeable.
Is that name maybe reserved due to copyright claims? Or will maybe many of the current opposition parties join the SANC in a UDF alliance with a single candidate for president?
This news about a possible split and a future coalition government in SA is one of the best I have heard for way to long a time. Best wishes,
Leifur
Post a Comment